ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025
Prognostic impact of tumor size on cancer-specific survival for postoperative WHO grade II oligodendroglioma: a SEER-based study.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: WHO grade II oligodendroglioma (OG/II) is a rare primary brain tumor with various outcomes. Our study aims to investigate prognostic factors for postoperative OG/II patients and then evaluate the instructional value of tumor size. Methods: We retrospectively studied the cases from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to identify and assess prognostic factors. The optimal cut-off value of tumor size was determined by X-tile analysis and verified by multivariate analyses. Subsequently, Subgroup analyses were performed based on tumor size. Result: 676 OG/II patients were enrolled in our study. Multivariate Cox analyses revealed that age > 60 (HR 3.52), male (HR 1.48), total resection (HR 0.38), and tumor size (HR 2.04) were independent factors in predicting cancer-specific survival (CCS). The optimal cut-off value for tumor size was 60 mm. Patients with tumor size less than 60 mm, age > 60 (HR 3.82), and radiation (HR 1.58) were associated with worse CSS, while total resection (HR 0.35) was associated with better CSS. Lastly, a tumor size-based nomogram was established objectively and accurately. Conclusion: Our study identified four crucial prognostic factors related to CSS in postoperative OG/II patients: age, sex, the extent of recession, and tumor size. A tumor size of 60 mm was an optimal cut-off point for dividing patients into low and high-risk groups. Patients in the low-risk group may not benefit from extended resection and radiation. Tumor size can be a valuable factor for making therapeutic schedules.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.