ArticlePorto biomedical journal
Clinicopathological correlates of vitamin D receptor expression in prostate cancer: results of genomic analysis.
Article in Porto biomedical journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common malignancy in men. Geography and environmental factors have been associated with varying incidence and mortalities in different groups. Vitamin D has antiproliferative effect on PCa cells, and its effect is mediated through vitamin D receptor (VDR). This study reported the correlation of VDR expression with some clinicopathological and biological features among a cohort of patients with PCa. Methods: Genomic and clinicopathological data of 497 patients with PCa reposited in The Cancer Genome Atlas were retrieved using Linux command in running codes and scripts and extrapolated onto SPSS version 28 for statistical analysis. Descriptive and inferential statistics were conducted to determine the proportions and associations of VDR expression with genomic variables and clinicopathological indices. The mechanism of VDR dysregulation was also interrogated. Results: Our results showed that high VDR expression was positively correlated with a high Gleason score ( Conclusion: VDR expression is associated with adverse clinicopathological indices, including late-stage disease profile, high-grade indices, and poorer response to ADT. VDR is also mainly deregulated by aberrant epigenetic mechanism. The study is limited by absence of some clinical information such as sunlight exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.