ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025
Artificial intelligence-based prediction of second stage duration in labor: a multicenter retrospective cohort analysis.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Duration of second stage of labor is crucial for fetal delivery, but the optimal length of this stage remains controversial. While extending the duration of second stage can reduce primary cesarean delivery rates, it may increase maternal and neonatal morbidities as the duration progresses. We aimed to develop a personalized machine learning (ML) model to predict the possible second-stage duration. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective study was conducted at four tertiary hospitals in China from September 2013 to October 2022. Data from three hospitals in Guangdong Province was selected as derivation set, and a geographically independent dataset from Fujian Province as the external validation set. Singleton vaginal deliveries with term live birth in a cephalic position were included. The primary outcome was the duration of the second stage of labor. Since durations beyond 3 h were rare, we developed binary classification models with thresholds at 1 h and 2 h. After the optimal features selected by recursive feature elimination (RFE) method, four ML algorithms were employed to build the models. The best model would be selected with the predictive performance and interpreted with Shapley Additive exPlanations method. The study is registered in Clinical Trial (ChiCTR2400085338). Findings: Electronic medical records of 79,381 vaginal deliveries were obtained, and 63,401 deliveries meeting the inclusion criteria were included in the final analysis. Eight risk features were selected through the RFE process. Gradient boosting machine implemented by decision tree models achieved the best performance, yielding areas under the curve for 1-h and 2-h models of 0.808 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.797-0.819) and 0.824 (95% CI 0.804-0.843) in the testing set, and 0.862 (95% CI 0.854-0.870) and 0.859 (95% CI 0.843-0.875) in the external validation set, respectively. Interpretation: An explainable and reliable ML model was developed to predict the probable second-stage duration, which could assist in individualized labor management. Factors such as first-stage duration and maternal age are potential predictors for the second stage. Funding: National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.82371689, N0.81771602), and National Key Research and Development Program of China (No.2021YFC2700703).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.