Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39963152›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2025

Comparing Cesarean Incisional Complications in Women With and Without Enoxaparin: A Quasi-Experimental Study.

Leili Hafizi, Freshteh Khoshniat, Masoumeh Mirteimouri, Safoura Khazaeian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Leili HafiziSupporting the Family and the Youth of Population Research Core, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences Mashhad Iran.
Freshteh KhoshniatSupporting the Family and the Youth of Population Research Core Hazrat Abolfazl Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences Kashmar Iran.ORCID 0009-0007-0557-6024
Masoumeh MirteimouriSupporting the Family and the Youth of Population Research Core, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences Mashhad Iran.
Safoura KhazaeianSupporting the Family and the Youth of Population Research Core Mashhad University of Medical Sciences Mashhad Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-4981-5417

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Although some women who undergo cesarean section need to receive prophylactic Enoxaparin due to the increased risk of thromboembolism during their puerperium period, the question is always raised of whether this drug with the mechanism of increased bleeding may increase surgical wound complications. Hence, the present study was conducted with the aim of a comparative study on complications of abdominal incision in cesarean section patients with and without receiving Enoxaparin. Methods: A quasi-experimental study was conducted on 789 cesarean section participants (317 receiving Enoxaparin and 472 control subjects), 20-40 years pregnant women in Imam Reza and Ummal-Banin hospitals in Mashhad, Iran. All participants who scored three or more for thromboembolism risk based on the National Protocol received Enoxaparin after surgery. Those with underlying wound complication risk factors were excluded from the study. Then, both groups were evaluated for abdominal incision complications up to 2 weeks after their delivery and were compared with each other. A Results: In total, 5% of patients in the Enoxaparin group and 5.5% in the control group had ulcer complications ( Conclusion: Based on the outcomes obtained in the present study, prescribing Enoxaparin after a cesarean in cases receiving this drug for thromboembolic prophylaxis did not significantly increase the complications of abdominal incision, and there was no need for more incision care.

Indexed as

cesareanenoxaparinhematomaincisionwound infection

Identifiers

PMID39963152
PMCPMC11830991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.