ArticleNeuropsychiatric disease and treatment2025
Electroencephalogram (EEG) Based Prediction of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Using Machine Learning.
Article in Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Mobile Neurofeedback on Theta-Gamma Coupling and Clinical Outcomes in Children with ADHD: A Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Randomized Clinical Trial.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2025Trial
- Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning Approaches for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Diagnosis: Protocol for a Scoping Review.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Neurophysiological Characterization of ADHD in Children Using EEG Signals: A Machine Learning Approach to Executive Function Networks.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Quantitative Electroencephalography as a Complement to Symptom-Based Psychiatric Diagnosis: A Narrative Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Integrating socioeconomic context with multimodal EEG data for improved ADHD risk screening.PloS one · 2026Article
- Predicting ADHD in Children and Adolescents With Artificial Intelligence: A Scoping Review of Common Models.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Toward a fair, gender-debiased classifier for the diagnosis of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder- a Machine-Learning based classification study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- An EEG-based machine learning framework for diagnosing acute sleep deprivation.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence for children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a scoping review.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a neurodevelopmental condition with challenges in timely and accurate diagnosis. This study evaluates the effectiveness of combining electroencephalogram (EEG) data with machine learning techniques to enhance ADHD diagnostic accuracy. Methods: A total of 168 participants, comprising 107 ADHD and 61 neurotypical (NT) individuals, were assessed using the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia Present and Lifetime Version Korean Version (K-SADS-PL-K). EEG data from 19 channels were analyzed across five frequency bands: delta (1-4 hz), theta (4-8 hz), alpha (8-12 hz), beta (12-30 hz), and gamma (30-51 hz). The Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) classifier was employed for classification, and Leave-One-Subject-Out (LOSO) cross-validation was used to ensure model robustness. Results: Data augmentation through 30-second segmentations generated 2434 EEG segments for ADHD and 1060 for NT. The XGBoost model achieved a test accuracy of 90.81% and an F1-score of 0.9347. Feature importance analysis using SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) values identified middle beta frequency features, particularly from the O1 electrode site, as significant contributors to classification. Conclusion: EEG-based machine learning models, such as the XGBoost classifier, show potential as non-invasive tools for ADHD diagnosis, offering high accuracy and interpretability. The novelty of this approach lies in combining SHAP analysis with data augmentation techniques and LOSO cross-validation, ensuring both explainability and robust generalizability. Future research with larger datasets and diverse populations is recommended to validate findings and explore clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.