Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39963087›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2025

Machine learning-based multi-pool Voigt fitting of CEST, rNOE, and MTC in Z-spectra.

Sajad Mohammed Ali, Peter C M van Zijl, Jannik Prasuhn, Ronnie Wirestam, Linda Knutsson, Nirbhay N Yadav

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sajad Mohammed AliDepartment of Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4707-8206
Peter C M van ZijlRussell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Jannik PrasuhnF.M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Ronnie WirestamDepartment of Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Linda KnutssonDepartment of Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4263-113X
Nirbhay N YadavRussell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Funding

TRD 4: Platforms for multi-modal and multi-scale imaging dataP41EB031771 · NIBIB · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI Hanzhang Lu, Peter CM Van Zijl · 2021 to 2026
$9.9M
The Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center (IDDRC) at CHOP/PennP50HD105354 · NICHD · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI ERIC D MARSH, ROBERT Thomas SCHULTZ · 2021 to 2026
$9.2M
Development and Translation of D-glucose as a Diagnostic Agent for MRI of CancerR01EB034978 · NIBIB · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI Linda Knutsson, Peter CM Van Zijl · 2023 to 2026
$2.5M
Non-Invasive Imaging of Neurological Glycogen Storage DiseaseR01NS127280 · NINDS · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI Nirbhay Narayan Yadav · 2022 to 2026
$2.1M
Cancerfonden 21 1652 PjNIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB031771NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB034978NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD105354NIH HHS P41 EB03177NIH HHS R01 EB034978NIH HHS R01 NS127280NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS127280Swedish Research Council 2019-03637
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFour-pool Voigt (FPV) machine learning (ML)-based fitting for Z-spectra was developed to reduce fitting times for clinical feasibility in terms of on-scanner analysis and to promote larger cohort studies. The approach was compared to four-pool Lorentzian (FPL)-ML-based modeling to empirically verify the advantage of Voigt models for Z-spectra.

methodsVoigt and Lorentzian models were fitted to human 3 T Z-spectral data using least squares (LS) to generate training data for the corresponding ML versions. Gradient boosting decision trees were trained, resulting in one Voigt and one Lorentzian ML model. Modeling accuracy was tested, and the fitting times of the ML models and LS versions were evaluated. The goodness of fits of Voigt and Lorentzian ML models were compared.

resultsThe training time for each ML model (Voigt and Lorentzian) was less than 1 min, and the modeling accuracy compared to the corresponding LS versions was excellent, as indicated by a nonsignificant difference between the parameters obtained by LS and corresponding ML versions. The average fitting time was 20 μs/spectrum for both ML models compared to 0.27 and 0.82 s/spectrum for LS with FPL and FPV, respectively. The goodness of fits of FPV-ML and FPL-ML differed significantly (p < 0.005), with FPV-ML showing an improvement for all tested data.

conclusionGradient boosting decision trees fitting of multi-pool Z-spectra significantly reduces fitting times compared to traditional LS approaches, allowing fast data processing while upholding fitting quality. Along with the short training times, this makes the method suitable for clinical settings and for large cohort research applications. The FPV-ML approach provides a significant improvement of goodness of fit compared to FPL-ML.

Indexed as

BrainImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingAlgorithmsHumansLeast-Squares AnalysisPhantoms, ImagingReproducibility of ResultsCESTLorentzian fittingmachine learningMTCrNOEVoigt fitting

Identifiers

PMID39963087
PMCPMC12021569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.