Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39963004›Full record

ArticleNursing open2025

Patients' Experiences With Advance Care Planning and Decision-Making: An Interview Study in Finnish Hospital Palliative Care Wards.

Anne Kuusisto, Kaija Saranto, Katriina Lähteenmäki, Anu Soikkeli-Jalonen, Elina Haavisto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anne KuusistoDepartment of Nursing Science, University of Turku Finland, Turku, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9950-1985
Kaija SarantoDepartment of Health and Social Management, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3195-1955
Katriina LähteenmäkiThe Wellbeing Services County of Satakunta, Pori, Finland.
Anu Soikkeli-JalonenHealth Sciences Unit of the Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6223-9880
Elina HaavistoDepartment of Nursing Science, University of Turku Finland, Turku, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9747-1428

Funding

the Finnish Government Research Funding (Satakunta Hospital District) 520/2018 415/2022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AIM AND

objectiveThis study described patients' experiences with advance care planning and decision-making in Finnish hospital palliative care wards.

designA descriptive qualitative study with semi-structured individual interviews.

methodsThe study group consisted of purposely selected patients in palliative care wards from two university hospital districts. A pretested interview guide was used. The interviews focused on three main themes with auxiliary questions. Data were gathered until data saturation was reached. The data were analysed using inductive content analysis.

resultsA total of 20 patients with cancer were interviewed. Patients' experiences with advance care planning in palliative care were grouped into three parent categories with subcategories: (1) Making plans for the end of life (need for psychosocial support in cancer disease and wish for goals of care discussion), (2) Symptom management planning (wish for pharmacological interventions for symptom management and wish for non-pharmacological interventions for symptom management) and (3) Palliative care coordination (need for discharge planning and wish for compatibility between team members). Patients' experiences with care decision-making in palliative care were grouped into two parent categories with subcategories: (1) healthcare professional as a care decision-maker (medical care decision-making, nursing care decision-making and inter-professional care decision-making) and (2) shared decision-making (need for patient involvement in shared decision-making and need for family member involvement in shared decision-making).

conclusionThis study highlights the need for advance care planning and involvement in shared decision-making in palliative care from patient perspectives. RELEVANCE FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE: The results from this study show that nurses must be critically concerned about the early and intentional initiation of palliative care. REPORTING

methodThe consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative studies checklist (COREQ) was used. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The data consists of answers given by patients in interviews.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningDecision MakingPalliative CareAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFinlandHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative Researchadvance care planningadvance directivesdeathinter‐professional relationsnursingpalliative carepatient care planningpatientsqualitative researchshared decision‐making

Identifiers

PMID39963004
PMCPMC11833169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.