Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39962948›Full record

ArticleEuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology2025

Functional or anatomical assessment of non-culprit lesions in acute myocardial infarction.

Xueming Xu, Chao Fang, Senqing Jiang, Yuzhu Chen, Jiawei Zhao, Sibo Sun, Yini Wang, Lulu Li, Dongxu Huang, Shuang Li and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The future of complete revascularisation: prioritising imaging-guided non-culprit lesion assessment.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Xueming XuState Key Laboratory of Frigid Zone Cardiovascular Diseases (SKLFZCD), Harbin, China.
Chao FangState Key Laboratory of Frigid Zone Cardiovascular Diseases (SKLFZCD), Harbin, China.
Senqing JiangState Key Laboratory of Frigid Zone Cardiovascular Diseases (SKLFZCD), Harbin, China.
Yuzhu ChenState Key Laboratory of Frigid Zone Cardiovascular Diseases (SKLFZCD), Harbin, China.
Jiawei ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Frigid Zone Cardiovascular Diseases (SKLFZCD), Harbin, China.
Sibo SunState Key Laboratory of Frigid Zone Cardiovascular Diseases (SKLFZCD), Harbin, China.
Yini WangState Key Laboratory of Frigid Zone Cardiovascular Diseases (SKLFZCD), Harbin, China.
Lulu LiState Key Laboratory of Frigid Zone Cardiovascular Diseases (SKLFZCD), Harbin, China.
Dongxu HuangState Key Laboratory of Frigid Zone Cardiovascular Diseases (SKLFZCD), Harbin, China.
Shuang LiState Key Laboratory of Frigid Zone Cardiovascular Diseases (SKLFZCD), Harbin, China.
Huai YuState Key Laboratory of Frigid Zone Cardiovascular Diseases (SKLFZCD), Harbin, China.
Tao ChenState Key Laboratory of Frigid Zone Cardiovascular Diseases (SKLFZCD), Harbin, China.
Jinfeng TanState Key Laboratory of Frigid Zone Cardiovascular Diseases (SKLFZCD), Harbin, China.
Xiaohui LiuState Key Laboratory of Frigid Zone Cardiovascular Diseases (SKLFZCD), Harbin, China.
Jiannan DaiState Key Laboratory of Frigid Zone Cardiovascular Diseases (SKLFZCD), Harbin, China.
Gary S MintzCardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA.
Bo YuState Key Laboratory of Frigid Zone Cardiovascular Diseases (SKLFZCD), Harbin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious studies have reported the value of quantitative flow ratio (QFR) to assess the physiological significance of non-culprit lesions (NCLs) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients and of optical coherence tomography (OCT)-defined thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA) to identify non-culprit vulnerable plaques.

aimsWe sought to systematically compare long-term NCL-related clinical prognosis in an AMI population utilising acute Murray fractal law-based QFR (μQFR) values and OCT-defined TCFA.

methodsThree-vessel OCT imaging and μQFR assessment were conducted in 645 AMI patients, identifying 1,320 intermediate NCLs in non-infarct-related arteries. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiac death, NCL-related non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), and NCL-related unplanned coronary revascularisation, with follow-up lasting up to 5 years.

resultsThe primary endpoint occurred in 59 patients (11.1%). OCT-defined TCFA independently predicted patient-level (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 3.05, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.80-5.19) and NCL-specific primary endpoints (adjusted HR 4.46, 95% CI: 2.33-8.56). The highest event rate of 29.6% was observed in patients with NCLs that were TCFA (+) with μQFR ≤0.80, compared to 16.3% in those that were also TCFA (+) but with μQFR>0.80, 6.0% in those that were TCFA (-) with μQFR ≤0.80, and 6.6% in those that were TCFA (-) with μQFR>0.80 (log-rank p<0.001). TCFA was an independent predictor for the primary endpoint in ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI; adjusted HR 3.27, 95% CI: 1.67-6.41) and non-STEMI (adjusted HR 3.26, 95% CI: 1.24-8.54) patients, whereas μQFR ≤0.80 was not.

conclusionsWhen assessing NCLs during the index procedure in AMI patients, OCT-defined TCFA serves as the dominant prognostic predictor for long-term clinical outcomes, rather than μQFR-determined physiological significance.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseCoronary VesselsMyocardial InfarctionPlaque, AtheroscleroticTomography, Optical CoherenceAgedCoronary AngiographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPercutaneous Coronary InterventionPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID39962948
PMCPMC11809226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.