ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2025
Impact of a Cancer-Associated Mutation on Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase1 Inhibition.
Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of a cancer-associated mutation and multiple serine phosphorylation on poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 2.Biophysical journal · 2026Article
- Four New Menadione Thioderivatives, Potential Antineoplastic Candidates: In Silico and PARP-1 Inhibition Studies.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comparison of Magnesium and Manganese Ions on the Structural and Catalytic Properties of Human DNA Polymerase Gamma.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase1 (PARP1) plays a vital role in DNA repair, and its inhibition in cancer cells may cause cell apoptosis. In this study, we investigated the effects of a PARP1 variant, V762A, which is strongly associated with several cancers in humans, on the inhibition of PARP1 by three FDA-approved inhibitors: niraparib, rucaparib, and talazoparib. Specifically, we compared the inhibition of the mutant to that of wild-type (WT) PARP1. Additionally, we investigated how the mutation influences the binding of these inhibitors to PARP1. Our work suggests that while mutant PARP1 exhibits only minor differences in residual fluctuations, backbone deviations, and residue motion correlations compared to the WT under niraparib and rucaparib inhibitions, it shows significant and distinct differences in these features when inhibited by talazoparib. Among the three inhibitions, talazoparib inhibition uniquely lowers the average residue fluctuations in the mutant than the WT including lower fluctuations of mutant's N- and C-terminal residues in the catalytic domain, conserved H-Y-E traid residues, and donor loop (D-loop) residues which are important for catalysis more effectively than other inhibitions. However, talazoparib also significantly enhances destabilizing interactions between the mutation site in the HD domain in the mutant than WT. Further, among the three inhibitions, talazoparib inhibition uniquely and significantly disrupts the functional fluctuations of terminal regions in the mutant, which are otherwise present in the WT. The mutation and inhibition do not significantly affect PARP1's essential dynamics. Lastly, these inhibitors bind to the V762A mutant more effectively than to the WT, with similar binding free energies between them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.