Observational studyActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2025
Outcomes associated with fetal nuchal translucency between 3.0 and 3.4 mm in the first trimester.
Observational study in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chromosomal and genetic anomalies in fetuses with nuchal translucency between 3.0 and 3.4 mm: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2026Review
- Association Between Increased Nuchal Translucency and Foetal CNS Abnormalities in Euploid Foetuses: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
- Article
- Outcomes associated with fetal nuchal translucency between 3.0 and 3.4 mm in the first trimester.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2025Observational
- Emanuel Syndrome: A Case Report With Isolated Nuchal Translucency Thickening.Case reports in genetics · 2025Article
- Down syndrome burden in China and globally: a comparative analysis of 1990-2021 trends and future projections based on GBD 2021 database.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDecisions concerning nuchal translucency (NT) between 3.0 and 3.4 mm remain controversial, particularly regarding whether to first calculate the combined first trimester screening test or to proceed directly with invasive testing. The literature suggests an increased risk of chromosomal aberration, as well as pathogenic copy number variations (CNVs) on chromosomal microarray, for fetuses with NT between 3.0 and 3.4 mm. The aim of this study was to describe genetic findings of fetuses with NT between 3.0 and 3.4 mm in the first trimester. The secondary objective was to describe ultrasound findings and adverse outcomes for these fetuses. The third objective was to compare genetic, ultrasound findings and adverse outcomes of fetuses with NT between 3.0 and 3.4 mm to those with NT ≥3.5 mm. MATERIAL AND
methodsWe conducted an observational, retrospective study in a referral center between 2017 and 2022. Genetic and ultrasound findings were compared between fetuses with NT between 3.0 and 3.4 mm and those with NT≥3.5 mm. An adverse outcome was defined as one of the following: miscarriage, perinatal death (stillbirth or neonatal death) or termination of pregnancy at parental request, and all major abnormalities or genetic disorders diagnosed before or after delivery.
resultsWe included 404 fetuses with NT≥3.0 mm who had invasive testing with available karyotype and chromosomal microarray, among whom 20.8% (84/404) had NT between 3.0 and 3.4 mm. The rate of adverse outcomes among fetuses with NT between 3.0 and 3.4 mm was 32.1% (27/84). The rates of chromosomal aberration, pathogenic CNVs, and major ultrasound abnormalities were 16.7% (14/84), 6.0%(5/84), and 9.2% (6/65), respectively, for fetuses with NT between 3.0 and 3.4 mm. In comparison, fetuses with NT greater than 3.5 mm had higher rates of chromosomal aberration and major ultrasound abnormalities, with rates of 47.5% (152/320) and 30.2% (49/162) respectively compared to 16.7% (14/84) and 9.2% (6/65) for fetuses with NT between 3.0 and 3.4 mm (p < 0.001 for both comparisons). However, the rate of pathogenic CNVs was not significantly different between the two groups, with rates of 1.9% (6/320) for NT≥3.5 mm and 6.0% (5/84) for NT between 3.0 and 3.4 mm (p = 0.06).
conclusionsThe rate of chromosomal aberration and pathogenic CNVs on chromosomal microarray is high among fetuses with NT between 3.0 and 3.4 mm, although these rates remain lower than those observed among fetuses with NT≥3.5 mm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.