ArticleZhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics2025
[Efficacy and safety of perampanel add-on therapy in children with epilepsy of genetic etiology].
Article in Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo investigate the efficacy and safety of perampanel (PER) add-on therapy in children with epilepsy of genetic etiology.
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 53 children who attended the Department of Neurology, Wuhan Children's Hospital, from November 2020 to April 2023. All children received PER add-on therapy and were diagnosed with epilepsy of genetic etiology based on whole-exome sequencing. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of children with a reduction in seizure frequency of ≥50% at month 12 of PER treatment (i.e., response rate), and the secondary outcome measures were response rates at months 3 and 6 of treatment. The influencing factors for the efficacy of PER add-on therapy in the treatment of epilepsy of genetic etiology were analyzed, and adverse events were recorded.
resultsThe median follow-up duration was 13.10 months. After 12 months of follow-up, 42 children were included in the analysis, comprising 25 boys (60%) and 17 girls (40%). The median initial dose of PER was 1.5 (1.0, 2.0) mg/d, and the median maintenance dose was 4.0 (3.0, 8.0) mg/d. The response rates to PER at months 3, 6, and 12 of treatment were 61% (30/49), 54% (25/46), and 48% (20/42), respectively. No significant difference in the efficacy of PER was observed between children with mutations in genes encoding different protein functions (
conclusionsPER add-on therapy demonstrates good efficacy and safety in children with epilepsy of genetic etiology. No influencing factors for the efficacy of PER have been identified to date.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.