Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39962639›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2025

Behind the Screen: An Exploratory Study of Factors Influencing Breast Screening Uptake in Lancashire (UK).

Yik Nok Bryan Lee, Alexander Montasem, Lauren Haworth, Jonathan Sinclair, Kim McGuire, Ambreen Chohan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Healthcare Providers' Strategies to Improve Breast Cancer Screening Among South Asian Women in Victoria.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yik Nok Bryan LeeAllied Health Research Unit, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6845-0292
Alexander MontasemSchool of Medicine, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7837-7751
Lauren HaworthAllied Health Research Unit, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1718-6564
Jonathan SinclairCentre for Applied Sport, Physical Activity and Performance, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2231-3732
Kim McGuireAllied Health Research Unit, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2713-8846
Ambreen ChohanAllied Health Research Unit, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0544-7832

Funding

The authors would like to acknowledge the University undergraduate internship scheme and Research Centre funding that enabled this project.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast screening uptake has improved nationally to 62% in the United Kingdom, though regionally, engagement challenges remain in northern regions such as Lancashire (54%-59%). It is important, therefore, to understand the barriers women face to enable appropriate person- and community-centred engagement in health screening behaviours.

objectivesThis study aimed to be the first mixed-method questionnaire exploration of women in Lancashire (the United Kingdom) to explore attitudes, behaviour, awareness, barriers and facilitators to breast screening.

designCross-sectional cohort study.

methodThe Breast Cancer Fear Scale, modified Mammography Self-Efficacy Scale and the General Practice Physical Activity Questionnaire were included in the questionnaire alongside open-ended elements on breast screening behaviour and awareness. Registered female participants (n = 50) were provided with digital assistance or language interpretation where requested.

resultsEthnicity, faith and location all affected perceived levels of breast screening awareness, yet only age and faith influenced understanding of the process. Irrespective of protected characteristics, fear of breast cancer did not significantly vary between women. Racially minoritised women were less comfortable in removing clothing during screening. Participants reported barriers related to health awareness, patient experience, screening age and access to healthcare. Facilitators to address barriers were identified using a socioecological framework to identify key areas of development needed at an individual, interpersonal, organisational, community and public policy level.

conclusionProtected characteristics and geographical location significantly influence breast screening behaviour. Targeted person-centred health awareness, cultural competency and inclusive practice are needed to promote awareness, remove taboos and open up dialogue and acceptance of breast cancer screening in communities. The use of the socioecological model highlighted that the responsibility to reduce barriers to breast screening in Lancashire is collective from an individual to public policy level. Further patient-public involvement would ensure adequate demographic representation and effectively investigate differences between ethnic subgroups. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This article captures the viewpoints of individuals with and without experience of the breast screening process in the United Kingdom. A small group of individuals from white and racially minoritised backgrounds were involved in the design of the study to ensure the suitability and acceptability of the tool.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeMammographyMass ScreeningPatient Acceptance of Health CareAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFearFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Kingdombarriersbreastbreast cancerpublic healthscreeningsocioecological

Identifiers

PMID39962639
PMCPMC11832429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.