ArticleThe Journal of animal ecology2025
Implications of summer breeding phenology on demography of monarch butterflies.
Article in The Journal of animal ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Implications of summer breeding phenology on demography of monarch butterflies.The Journal of animal ecology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Phenological changes have been widely documented in animal and plant responses to directional environmental change. However, predicting the consequences of these shifts for species interactions and population viability requires knowledge of vital rate responses to biotic and abiotic drivers. Here, we paired long-term phenology data documenting monarch butterfly abundance and occurrence of their milkweed hostplant with outdoor experiments in the central United States to ask how changes in spring arrival times to monarch breeding sites affect their development, survival, and within-season population growth. Monarch arrival times did not change across the 17 years of monitoring, but the peak abundance of monarchs, which occurred just prior to their fall migration, shifted 9 days later in 2019 as compared to 2003. Summer population growth declined from 2003 to 2019, significant in ~80% bootstrap calculations. Phenological changes in milkweed occurrence mirrored changes in monarch abundance, happening later through time. Our field experiment showed that early season larval survival was highest when the timing of hatching matched the average timing of the first natural monarch cohort; survival was lowest when egg hatching shifted 14 days earlier. The results of our study indicate that earlier arrival of adult monarchs to summer breeding habitat would be costly for monarchs-but field survey data show that arrival times have not changed to date. Instead, the local changes we observed in the timing of peak abundance occurred towards the end of the breeding season, not the onset. At present, we conclude that changes in early season phenology are not a threat to eastern North American monarchs living in the central United States, but drivers of breeding-season growth rates and changes in late-season phenology merit further study, both in the central United States and in other parts of the monarch's range.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.