Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39962628›Full record

ArticleRapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM2025

Determination of Collisional Cross Section Using Microscale High-Field Asymmetric Waveform ion Mobility Spectroscopy-Mass Spectrometry (FAIMS-MS).

Kristina Krasnova, Colin S Creaser, James C Reynolds

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kristina KrasnovaCentre for Analytical Science, Department of Chemistry, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7026-6449
Colin S CreaserCentre for Analytical Science, Department of Chemistry, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.
James C ReynoldsCentre for Analytical Science, Department of Chemistry, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1176-3030

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleCollisional cross sections (CCS) are an important characteristic of gas-phase ions that are measured using ion mobility-mass spectrometry (IMS). Typically, CCS measurements are performed with drift-tube IMS or travelling-wave IMS. However. in a high-field asymmetric waveform ion mobility (FAIMS) device, ion heating effects make CCS determination more challenging. This research explores whether CCS can be predicted with microscale FAIMS by using known CCS standards.

methodsAn Owlstone ultraFAIMS microscale FAIMS spectrometer was coupled to an Orbitrap Exactive mass spectrometer. Two different CCS standard mixtures (tetraalkylammonium halides [TAAHs] and poly-DL-alanine oligomers) were used to evaluate the system's potential to determine CCS. Test peptide bradykinin acetate and substance P were used to evaluate CCS determination accuracy for singly and doubly charged peptide species using external calibration with a series of poly-DL-alanine peptides for +1, +2 charge states.

resultsCalibrations with excellent correlation coefficients (R

conclusionsDistinct relationships were observed between CCS and transmission CF with both calibrants. Optimum accuracy was obtained at DF 240-260 Td. At lower DF, accuracy is reduced by insufficient resolution of analyte ions from solvent cluster adducts, while at higher DF values, poor transmission becomes a factor. Nevertheless, these data suggest microscale FAIMS can conduct CCS measurements with reasonable accuracy when the compound being measured has similar structural features to the CCS standards used.

Indexed as

CCSFAIMSMass spectrometry

Identifiers

PMID39962628
PMCPMC11832801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.