ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2025
A comprehensive prognosis model for adult septic shock: SOFAplusCALLY index.
Article in European journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The prognostic value of the CALLY index in sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Predictive Value of C-Reactive Protein-Albumin-Lymphocyte Index for Multiple Organ Failure Syndrome in Elderly Patients with Sepsis.Biochemical genetics · 2026Article
- An exploratory study evaluating the predictive capacity of the CALLY index and SOFA-2 for 28-day all-cause mortality in patients with septic shock.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- External validation of the CALLY index and development of a laboratory-based model for 28-day mortality in sepsis: a two-center study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the C-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte (CALLY) index as a prognostic marker in patients with sepsis.BMC emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Risk factors for mortality and development of a predictive model in pediatric sepsis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEarly assessment and intervention are crucial for improving survival in septic shock. This study aimed to address the shortcomings of existing scoring systems in predicting the risk of early death, particularly in identifying patient populations that require more precise prognostic assessments.
methodsThis retrospective study included 143 patients with septic shock admitted to the intensive care unit of a tertiary hospital between January 1, 2019, and June 30, 2024. Patients were stratified by 28-day survival status. Binary logistic regression analysis identified independent predictors of early mortality and developed a prognostic model, which was validated using receiver operating characteristic curves.
resultsAmong the patients, 106 survived, whereas 37 died. Multi-factor binary logistic regression analysis identified the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score and the C-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte (CALLY) index as significant independent predictors of 28-day mortality (p < 0.05), culminating in the formulation of the "SOFAplusCALLY" model. This model showed superior predictive accuracy compared to other Scoring systems (area under the curve: 0.90, p < 0.01) and was validated for robustness in both training and validation cohorts.
conclusionsThe CALLY index and SOFA score independently forecast 28-day mortality in adults with septic shock, offering substantial clinical utility for forecasting patient prognosis. The SOFAplusCALLY model, synthesized from both indices, comprehensively assesses the clinical status of patients with septic shock and enhances prognostic accuracy, which is crucial for clinical decision-making and resource allocation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.