SynthesisArchives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique2025
A global scoping review on the patterns of medical fraud and abuse: integrating data-driven detection, prevention, and legal responses.
Synthesis in Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analysis of the current situation and influencing factors of burnout of medical insurance specialists in public hospitals in Guangxi, China under the background of the "Sanming Model" reform- cases of healthcare system reform from low and middle income regions.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- What goals does China's medical insurance fund supervision aim to achieve? A quantitative analysis based on national-level policies.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Article
- Review
- Enhancing Healthcare Integrity Using Simple Statistical Methods: Detecting Irregularities in Historical Dermatology Services Payments.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMedical fraud and abuse represent significant global challenges in healthcare systems, resulting in financial losses estimated at 3% to 15% of total healthcare expenditures annually. These practices compromise both the cost-efficiency and quality of care delivery. The aim of this study is to provide a comprehensive scoping review of the patterns and strategies for combating medical fraud and abuse, with a focus on prevention, detection, and legal responses.
methodsThe review followed Arksey and O'Malley's five-step framework for scoping reviews. A systematic search was conducted using keywords such as "fraud," "abuse," and "health insurance" in databases including Medline, Scopus, Elsevier, PubMed, BMJ, and ScienceDirect. The search spanned literature published between 2000 and 2024. Additional sources, such as organizational websites of healthcare fraud associations, were consulted. Studies were selected based on inclusion criteria emphasizing definitions, detection, prevention, and management methods related to healthcare fraud. A total of 31 studies were ultimately included.
resultsThe findings highlight the multifaceted nature of healthcare fraud and abuse, involving various actors such as healthcare providers, patients, and insurers. Key methods for detecting fraud include advanced data-driven techniques like machine learning, data mining, and predictive analytics, which were predominantly employed in high-income countries. Traditional methods, such as manual audits and inspections, remain common in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) but are less effective due to resource limitations. Preventive strategies include ethical training for healthcare providers, patient education, implementation of strict recruitment policies, and the establishment of robust internal controls. Legal responses, such as punitive measures, inter-agency collaboration, and incentive-based programs, were identified as essential components of a comprehensive fraud management strategy. A regional disparity in detection and prevention methods underscores the need for context-specific strategies tailored to the infrastructure and regulatory environments of different countries. DISCUSSION: High-income countries, such as the United States and European nations, leverage advanced detection technologies and strict legal frameworks, which have proven effective in mitigating healthcare fraud. In contrast, LMICs often rely on traditional methods and informal deterrents due to technological and regulatory constraints. The findings suggest that integrating digital solutions, such as electronic health records and centralized data systems, could enhance fraud detection in resource-limited settings. Additionally, the importance of ethical training, cultural shifts, and patient empowerment in preventing fraud was emphasized. Collaboration between healthcare providers, insurers, and regulatory agencies emerged as a critical factor for effective fraud management.
conclusionAddressing medical fraud and abuse requires a multi-pronged approach combining prevention, detection, and legal responses. Advanced technologies, ethical reforms, and robust legal frameworks are pivotal in building transparent and trustworthy healthcare systems. Policymakers, particularly in LMICs, should prioritize capacity-building initiatives, international collaborations, and the adoption of cost-effective technological solutions. Future research should explore the long-term impacts of incentive-based programs and legal enforcement on fraud reduction, with a focus on tailoring interventions to specific healthcare system vulnerabilities. IMPLICATIONS: This study provides actionable insights for healthcare administrators and policymakers seeking to develop targeted strategies to combat fraud and abuse. It underscores the necessity of balancing technology-driven solutions with ethical and regulatory reforms to create a holistic and sustainable approach to fraud management globally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.