ArticleBMC public health2025
Unveiling the disparities between private and public preschools in the risk for pinworm infections in China: a multicentre cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Understanding the trends, clustering, and risk factors of pinworm infection in preschool settings: A repeated cross-sectional multi-center study between 2019 and 2024.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn China, public preschools only admit children from local permanent resident families, differing from private preschools admitting children mostly from transient population families such as work migrants. Thus, this study aims to compare pinworm infection rate and its risk factors between private and public preschools to contribute to the limited understanding of the disparities.
methodsA three-year cross-sectional study was conducted in Jiangsu Province, China from 2019 to 2021. In each study site, two preschools types were selected: private preschool and public preschool. Multi-stage cluster sampling was applied. The study sites, preschools, and classes were selected based on convenience and cooperation. The calculated sample size for each preschool was 229. Participants were expected to proportionally distributed across the lower, the middle, and the upper grade to balance the age bracket. Questionnaire surveys were administered to parents with teachers' help. One adhesive cellophane tape swab sample was collected by local health workers from children in the morning at preschool. Single factor and multiple backward logistic regression analysis were conducted to identify the risk factors for pinworm infections.
resultsThis study enrolled 3678, 2568, and 2529 preschool children in 2019, 2020, and 2021, respectively. The three-year pooled infection rate was 0.88% (1.46% for private preschool and 0.18% for public preschool). The pinworm infection rates were statistically higher in private preschool children than in public preschool children (2.07% vs. 0.24% in 2019, P-value < 0.001; 0.82% vs. 0.08% in 2020, P-value = 0.014; 1.22% vs. 0.19% in 2021, P-value = 0.008; respectively). Private preschool was a risk factor for pinworm infection (OR = 6.534, 95%CI = 2.523-22.336). Older age and worse hygiene habit were risk factors among private preschool children (OR = 1.476, 95%CI = 1.152-1.911; OR = 1.311, 95%CI = 1.053-1.606). Among public preschool children, a medium or higher family income level was a protective factor for pinworm infection (OR = 0.081, 95%CI = 0.011-0.413).
conclusionThe results indicate that private preschool with children mostly from transient population should be prioritized for pinworm control. It is valuable for policymakers and health staff aiming to improve sanitation and reduce pinworm infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.