Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39962583›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Unveiling the disparities between private and public preschools in the risk for pinworm infections in China: a multicentre cross-sectional study.

Fanzhen Mao, Xiangzhen Xu, Feng Tang, Bixian Ni, Qiang Zhang, Jiayao Zhang, Yaobao Liu, You Li, Jun Cao

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Fanzhen MaoSchool of Public Health, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety and Emergency Prevention and Control Technology of Higher Education Institutions in Jiangsu Province, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Xiangzhen XuJiangsu Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory on Parasite and Vector Control Technology, National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Parasitic Disease Control and Prevention, Wuxi, China.
Feng TangJiangsu Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory on Parasite and Vector Control Technology, National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Parasitic Disease Control and Prevention, Wuxi, China.
Bixian NiJiangsu Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory on Parasite and Vector Control Technology, National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Parasitic Disease Control and Prevention, Wuxi, China.
Qiang ZhangJiangsu Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory on Parasite and Vector Control Technology, National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Parasitic Disease Control and Prevention, Wuxi, China.
Jiayao ZhangJiangsu Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory on Parasite and Vector Control Technology, National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Parasitic Disease Control and Prevention, Wuxi, China.
Yaobao LiuSchool of Public Health, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety and Emergency Prevention and Control Technology of Higher Education Institutions in Jiangsu Province, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China. yaobao0721@163.com.
You LiSchool of Public Health, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety and Emergency Prevention and Control Technology of Higher Education Institutions in Jiangsu Province, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China. you.li@njmu.edu.cn.
Jun CaoSchool of Public Health, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety and Emergency Prevention and Control Technology of Higher Education Institutions in Jiangsu Province, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China. caojuncn@hotmail.com.

Funding

Jiangsu Commission of Health Medical Research Project M2022064the Jiangsu Province Capability Improvement Project through Science, Technology, and Education ZDXYS202207
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn China, public preschools only admit children from local permanent resident families, differing from private preschools admitting children mostly from transient population families such as work migrants. Thus, this study aims to compare pinworm infection rate and its risk factors between private and public preschools to contribute to the limited understanding of the disparities.

methodsA three-year cross-sectional study was conducted in Jiangsu Province, China from 2019 to 2021. In each study site, two preschools types were selected: private preschool and public preschool. Multi-stage cluster sampling was applied. The study sites, preschools, and classes were selected based on convenience and cooperation. The calculated sample size for each preschool was 229. Participants were expected to proportionally distributed across the lower, the middle, and the upper grade to balance the age bracket. Questionnaire surveys were administered to parents with teachers' help. One adhesive cellophane tape swab sample was collected by local health workers from children in the morning at preschool. Single factor and multiple backward logistic regression analysis were conducted to identify the risk factors for pinworm infections.

resultsThis study enrolled 3678, 2568, and 2529 preschool children in 2019, 2020, and 2021, respectively. The three-year pooled infection rate was 0.88% (1.46% for private preschool and 0.18% for public preschool). The pinworm infection rates were statistically higher in private preschool children than in public preschool children (2.07% vs. 0.24% in 2019, P-value < 0.001; 0.82% vs. 0.08% in 2020, P-value = 0.014; 1.22% vs. 0.19% in 2021, P-value = 0.008; respectively). Private preschool was a risk factor for pinworm infection (OR = 6.534, 95%CI = 2.523-22.336). Older age and worse hygiene habit were risk factors among private preschool children (OR = 1.476, 95%CI = 1.152-1.911; OR = 1.311, 95%CI = 1.053-1.606). Among public preschool children, a medium or higher family income level was a protective factor for pinworm infection (OR = 0.081, 95%CI = 0.011-0.413).

conclusionThe results indicate that private preschool with children mostly from transient population should be prioritized for pinworm control. It is valuable for policymakers and health staff aiming to improve sanitation and reduce pinworm infections.

Indexed as

EnterobiasisPrivate SectorPublic SectorSchoolsChild, PreschoolChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleRisk FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesChildrenChinaInfectionPinwormPrivate preschoolPublic preschoolRisk factor

Identifiers

PMID39962583
PMCPMC11834629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.