Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39962552›Full record

ArticleJournal of health, population, and nutrition2025

Body count- distribution, determinants and geographical mapping of lifetime sexual partners among Gen-X, Millennial and Gen-Z: hierarchical regression modelling study of nationally representative Indian survey.

Pritam Halder, Girish Jeer, Shivani Rathor, Manish Chandra Prabhakar, Ankita Chattopadhyay, Sushanta Sarkar, Anamika Das

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of health, population, and nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pritam HalderDepartment of Community Medicine and School of Public Health, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India. rynedann@gmail.com.ORCID 0009-0008-2407-6807
Girish JeerCentre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, 110049, Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0001-6685-9721
Shivani RathorDepartment of Medical Parasitology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India.ORCID 0009-0003-3052-5158
Manish Chandra PrabhakarDepartment of Community Medicine and School of Public Health, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6131-7146
Ankita ChattopadhyayDepartment of Psychiatry, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research, Campus Rd, Gorimedu, Dhanvantari Nagar, Puducherry, 605006, India.ORCID 0000-0002-9313-1717
Sushanta SarkarDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Saroj Gupta Cancer Center and Research Institute, Kolkata, 700063, India.ORCID 0000-0003-3991-956X
Anamika DasDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Employees State Insurance Corporation Hospital and Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Basaidarpur, New Delhi, 11005, India.ORCID 0000-0002-1381-7349

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe number of lifetime sexual partners is a critical factor in public health, influencing the transmission of sexually transmitted infections and HIV/AIDS. This study aims to explore the distribution, determinants, and geographical mapping of lifetime sexual partners among three generational cohorts in India-Generation X, Generation Y/ Millennials, and Generation Z-using data from the National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5).

methodsData were analysed from 149,665 participants (67,352 men and 80,313 women) from the NFHS-5 (2019-2021). Participants were categorized into Generation X (born 1981-1996), Millennials (born 1997-2010), and Generation Z (born 2010-2024). The primary outcome was the total number of lifetime sexual partners, with explanatory variables including demographic, socioeconomic, health-related, and behavioural factors. Hierarchical linear regression models were employed to assess associations and generate geographical mapping across Indian states and union territories.

resultsThe mean number of lifetime sexual partners was higher in males (3.29) compared to females (2.40), with significant regional and generational variations. Males in the North-East regions reported the highest averages, particularly among Generation X. Significant determinants included religion, caste, employment status, and health insurance. Risky behaviours, such as smoking and alcohol consumption, were positively associated with the number of sexual partners in males, while comprehensive HIV/AIDS knowledge was linked to fewer partners across genders.

conclusionThis study highlights significant generational, gender, and regional disparities in sexual behaviour across India. The findings suggest the need for targeted public health interventions that address specific cultural and socioeconomic contexts, promote health awareness, and integrate sexual health education with broader efforts to reduce risky behaviours and gender-based violence.

Indexed as

Sexual BehaviorSexual PartnersAdolescentAdultFemaleHealth SurveysHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedSexually Transmitted DiseasesSocioeconomic FactorsYoung AdultBody countDeterminantsDistributionGenerationGen-XGen-YGen-ZGeographical patternHierarchical regressionLifetime sexual partnersMillennialModelNFHSSexual partners

Identifiers

PMID39962552
PMCPMC11834387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.