ArticleBMC research notes2025
Assessment of antibiofilm and quorum quenching potencies of environmental bacteria in controlling biofilm of food spoilage bacteria.
Article in BMC research notes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Genomic and phenotypic diversities among Bacillus cereus isolates from cosmetics.BMC microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis research aims to investigate anti-quorum sensing and antibiofilm activity of supernatants from environmental bacteria against the biofilm formed by food spoilage bacteria such as Bacillus cereus, Bacillus subtilis, and Shewanella putrefaciens.
resultsSupernatants were generated from ten environmental bacteria isolates (A19, A30, A32, A40, B10, B212, C1, J70, J73, and T152), with four isolates (A19, A32, A40, B212) showed anti-quorum sensing activity against Chromobacterium violaceum wild type as indicator bacteria. In inhibition and destruction assays, the highest percentage inhibition of 81.42% and 81.33% by B10 and B212, respectively, against B. cereus and J73 against B. subtilis was recorded at 87.45%. While A32, T152, and C1 performed the highest destruction against B. cereus, B. subtilis, and S. putrefaciens with percentages of 45.4%, 83.81%, 74.81%, respectively. Observation using light microscopy and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) revealed C, O, Na, Mg, Al, Si, K, and Ca elements were detected which might play role in biofilm formation. Based on 16s rRNA sequencing, the environmental bacteria isolates were identified as Enterobacter, Acinetobacter, Acinetobacter, Pantoea genera, C1, and T152. These results imply that these bacteria have destructing and inhibiting potential against Bacillus cereus, Bacillus subtillis, Shewanella putrefaciens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.