ReviewJournal of eating disorders2025
Harnessing precision nutrition to individualize weight restoration in anorexia nervosa.
Review in Journal of eating disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Starch-Based Functional Ingredients in Baking: A Review of Advances in Starch Derivatives, Quality Enhancement, and Reduction of Fermentable Oligosaccharides, Disaccharides, Monosaccharides, and Polyols.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Personal causal modeling of affect and eating behaviors in bulimia nervosa: implications for personalized treatment.Journal of eating disorders · 2026Article
- Gut Microbiota in Women with Eating Disorders: A New Frontier in Pathophysiology and Treatment.Nutrients · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anorexia nervosa (AN) is a severe psychiatric disorder for which effective treatment and sustained recovery are contingent upon successful weight restoration, yet the efficacy of existing treatments is suboptimal. This narrative review considers the potential of precision nutrition for tailoring dietary interventions to individual characteristics to enhance acute and longer-term weight outcomes in AN. We review key factors that drive variation in nutritional requirements, including energy expenditure, fecal energy loss, the gut microbiota, genetic factors, and psychiatric comorbidities. Although scientific evidence supporting precision nutrition in AN is limited, preliminary findings suggest that individualized nutrition therapies, particularly those considering duration of illness and the gut microbiota, may augment weight gain. Some patients may benefit from microbiota-directed dietary plans that focus on restoring microbial diversity, keystone taxa, or functions that promote energy absorption, which could enhance weight restoration-although stronger evidence is needed to support this approach. Furthermore, accounting for psychiatric comorbidities such as depression and anxiety as well as genetic factors influencing metabolism may help refine nutrition prescriptions improving upon existing energy estimation equations, which were not developed for patients with AN. Given the reliance on large sample sizes, costly data collection, and the need for computationally intensive artificial intelligence algorithms to assimilate deep phenotypes into personalized interventions, we highlight practical considerations related to the implementation of precision nutrition approaches in clinical practice. More research is needed to identify which factors, including metabolic profiles, genetic markers, demographics, and habitual lifestyle behaviors, are most critical to target for individualizing weight restoration, and whether personalized recommendations can be practicably applied to improve and sustain patient recovery from this debilitating disorder with high relapse and mortality rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.