Observational studyBMC health services research2025
Patient coordination during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Amsterdam region: effects on capacity utilization and patient flow.
Observational study in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo manage COVID-19 surge demand, Dutch regional and national task forces were installed to coordinate a proportionate patient distribution. This study examined the effect of centralized COVID-19 patient coordination on hospital capacity utilization during the pandemic.
methodsA retrospective observational double cohort study compared intra- and interregional patient coordination by the regional task force ROAZ Noord-Holland Flevoland. Coordination was compared to a simulated scenario without coordination based on a queueing model during two time periods from January 1, 2021, until May 1, 2021 and from August 1, 2021, until December 1, 2021. Daily data on patient ICU and clinical COVID-19 patient transfers, number of admissions, and capacity were assessed. The primary outcome was hospital capacity utilization.
resultsOverall, 1,213 patients were transferred both within the eleven regional hospitals and outside the region during cohort I and 528 patients during cohort II. During the first cohort, eight hospitals (ICU patients) and two hospitals (clinical patients) showed a utilization factor exceeding 100% without coordination which reduced to below 100% with coordination. During the second cohort, utilization factors exceeding 100% varied between the scenarios with and without coordination. In both cohorts, the majority of hospitals that showed a utilization factor below 100% in the scenario without coordination, showed an increased utilization factor in the scenario with coordination.
conclusionThis retrospective double cohort analysis based on regional coordination of COVID-19 patients and a simulated scenario of absent regional coordination, identified that load-balancing of COVID-19 care demand generally resulted in an improved distribution of utilization among hospitals. In a crisis, we suggest a swift upscale from local, regional to national centralized coordination activity to enable inter and intra-regional patient coordination at an early stage. Future research is recommended to explore the applicability of coordination for other patient categories to benefit from regional centralization during a crises.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.