ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025
De-identification of clinical notes with pseudo-labeling using regular expression rules and pre-trained BERT.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Large language model derived regular expressions for sleep phenotyping from electronic health record: a feasibility study.Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2026Article
- Protecting medical privacy with pretrained language models: named entity recognition-based de-identification in Korean unstructured electronic medical records.npj health systems · 2025Article
- Experience of Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease Surgery Patients: Sentiment Analysis Using the Korean Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (KoBERT) Model.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDe-identification of clinical notes is essential to utilize the rich information in unstructured text data in medical research. However, only limited work has been done in removing personal information from clinical notes in Korea.
methodsOur study utilized a comprehensive dataset stored in the Note table of the OMOP Common Data Model at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital. This dataset includes 11,181,617 radiology and 9,282,477 notes from various other departments (non-radiology reports). From this, 0.1% of the reports (11,182) were randomly selected for training and validation purposes. We used two de-identification strategies to improve performance with limited and few annotated data. First, a rule-based approach is used to construct regular expressions on the 1,112 notes annotated by domain experts. Second, by using the regular expressions as label-er, we applied a semi-supervised approach to fine-tune a pre-trained Korean BERT model with pseudo-labeled notes.
resultsValidation was conducted using 342 radiology and 12 non-radiology notes labeled at the token level. Our rule-based approach achieved 97.2% precision, 93.7% recall, and 96.2% F1 score from the department of radiology notes. For machine learning approach, KoBERT-NER that is fine-tuned with 32,000 automatically pseudo-labeled notes achieved 96.5% precision, 97.6% recall, and 97.1% F1 score.
conclusionBy combining a rule-based approach and machine learning in a semi-supervised way, our results show that the performance of de-identification can be improved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.