ArticleBMC public health2025
Minimum diet diversity-women score and predictors of school adolescent girl stunting and thinness in Northwest Ethiopia.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Undernutrition and Associated Factors Among Pregnant Women Attending Antenatal Care: As a Strategy for Reducing Perinatal Morbidity.Nutrition and metabolic insights · 2026Article
- Gender-based analysis of adolescent nutrition: diet, lifestyle factors, and socioeconomic influences.BMC public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLimited data exist on adolescent nutrition. This school-based cross-sectional study aimed to assess dietary practices, nutritional status, and associated factors among adolescent girls.
methodsTwo hundred seventy-nine primary and secondary school girls were selected via multistage sampling. A pretested questionnaire and 24-h recall method were employed to gather data on background characteristics and dietary practices. The questionnaire was pretested with 20 adolescents from nonparticipating schools to assess clarity and reliability. Feedback from the pretest was used to refine the questionnaire. The minimum dietary diversity for women (MDD-W) was used as an indicator of diet quality, where women were considered to have adequate dietary diversity if they consumed at least five of ten food groups in the past 24 h. Key informant interviews were used to explore nutritional problems, while anthropometric measurements were taken to assess nutritional status. Height and weight, combined with age, were used to calculate height-for-age and BMI-for-age z scores via WHO AnthroPlus software. Nutritional status was categorized as stunted (< -2SD), thin (< -2SD), normal (-2SD to + 2SD), or overweight (> + 2SD). A multivariate binary logistic regression model identified predictors of nutritional status. The quantitative data were analyzed via SPSS, and the qualitative data were analyzed via ATLAS.ti.
resultsOnly 24% of the students met the MDD-W. Predominant consumption of plant-source foods (100%) and low animal-source food intake (< 20%) were observed. Environmental, social, and cultural factors are barriers to nutrition, whereas cultural food preferences act as reinforcing factors. The prevalence rates of thinness, stunting, and overweight were 7.2%, 6.4%, and 5.7%, respectively, with undernutrition being more prevalent in younger adolescents (10-14 years). Adolescents with low fast food consumption and those in late adolescence were less likely to be stunted or thin.
conclusionPoor dietary practices and undernutrition, particularly among younger adolescents, were observed. Comprehensive programs addressing environmental, social, and cultural barriers are needed to improve adolescent nutrition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.