Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39962445›Full record

Trial reportBMC cancer2025

Randomized controlled trial on the efficacy of topical urea-based cream in preventing capecitabine-associated hand-foot syndrome.

Concord Wongkraisri, Kriengkrai Chusuwanrak, Apirom Laocharoenkeat, Leena Chularojanamontri, Akarin Nimmannit, Suthinee Ithimakin

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05348278 (Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate Efficacy of Urea-based Cream for Prevention of Capecitabine-associated Hand Foot Skin Reactions), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05348278 phase2 / phase3unknown statusnot on this map

Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate Efficacy of Urea-based Cream for Prevention of Capecitabine-associated Hand Foot Skin Reactions

TypeinterventionalSponsorMahidol UniversityRan2021 to 2023Enrolled214ConditionsHand-Foot SyndromeArmsUrea cream
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Concord WongkraisriDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Kriengkrai ChusuwanrakDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Apirom LaocharoenkeatPharmacy Department, Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Leena ChularojanamontriDepartment of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Akarin NimmannitDepartment of Research, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Suthinee IthimakinDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. aesi105@yahoo.co.th.

Funding

the Routine to Research (R2R) unit, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University (IO) R016535006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHand-foot syndrome (HFS) is a common adverse event of capecitabine causing treatment modifications. Topical urea cream can reduce sorafenib-induced hand-foot skin reaction. However, its benefit in preventing capecitabine-associated HFS was not seen early in the course and had been unknown with long-term use. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of urea cream for HFS prophylaxis throughout capecitabine treatment.

methodsPatients with cancer who received capecitabine were randomized (1:1) to receive usual care alone or in combination with urea-based cream. The incidence and degree of HFS were assessed at each capecitabine cycle. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with any grade HFS. The secondary endpoints included the proportion of patients with severe (≥ grade 3) HFS, modifications in capecitabine because of HFS, and HFS onset.

resultsAfter a median of six capecitabine cycles, any grade HFS was reported by 68 of 109 patients (62.4%) who received usual care and by 60 of 107 patients (56%) who used urea cream (p = 0.36). The patients who received usual care and urea cream had similar proportions of grade 3 HFS occurrence [52 (47.7%) vs. 44 (41.1%), respectively, p = 0.34] and needed capecitabine modification because of HFS [20 patients (18.3%) vs. 17 patients (15.9%), respectively, p = 0.89], as well as similar HFS onset.

conclusionsUrea-based cream did not prevent capecitabine-associated HFS, reduce capecitabine modification, and delay HFS onset. However, it had a tendency to lessen HFS severity, especially in the later cycles of capecitabine. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05348278, registered on April 21, 2022.

Indexed as

Antimetabolites, AntineoplasticCapecitabineHand-Foot SyndromeNeoplasmsUreaAdministration, TopicalAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSkin CreamTreatment OutcomeAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticCapecitabineUreaCapecitabineHand-foot syndromeProphylaxisUrea cream

Identifiers

PMID39962445
PMCPMC11831840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.