ArticleBMC public health2025
The development of disaster preparedness education for public: a scoping review.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring human-induced flood risks and sustainable urban resilience in Iwo Nigeria with focus on awareness drivers and mitigation pathways.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The intention to adopt mental mHealth services in emergencies: pre-engagement social determinants of PTSD-Coach app use.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- A multidimensional tool in disaster medicine: Development of the disaster anxiety scale.Northern clinics of Istanbul · 2026Article
- The influence of disaster knowledge, official trust, and sources of warning information on public risk perception in typhoon-prone areas of China: a structural equation modeling analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- The Impact of Virtual Reality Simulation Training on Earthquake Preparedness Knowledge and Practices Among Rural Volunteers in Indonesia: Quasi-Experimental Repeated-Measures Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Cultivating Disaster Preparedness: Scoping Review of Technology's Contribution to Situational Awareness and Disaster Mindset in Disaster Medicine.Online journal of public health informatics · 2025Review
- Disaster management education in environmental health programs: Academic perspectives within the South African higher education context.Jamba (Potchefstroom, South Africa) · 2025Article
- From pandemics to preparedness: harnessing AI, CRISPR, and synthetic biology to counter biosecurity threats.Frontiers in public health · 2025Review
- Enhancing global disaster preparedness: A scoping review of the current integration of situational awareness and disaster mindset in healthcare education.AIMS public health · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDisasters have become an increasing concern globally due to their devastating impacts on communities, economies, and infrastructure. The rising frequency and intensity of disasters necessitate a more comprehensive, proactive and systematic approach in preparing communities to mitigate and respond effectively. To address this, disaster preparedness education for public has emerged as a crucial component of disaster risk reduction strategies and plays a crucial role in enhancing the resilience of communities and minimizing the adverse effects of disasters.
objectiveThis scoping review aims to explore and map the key findings related to the development of disaster preparedness education for public and identify key themes, gaps, and challenges in this field. MATERIALS AND
methodsA scoping review of literature was undertaken to assess research articles and preprints from the date of establishment to March 30, 2023. Databases included PubMed database (MEDLINE), ISI Web of Science (WOS), Google Scholar and Web of Science. Inclusion criteria were: (a) described preparedness education, (b) focused on an disaster or emergency. Data were narratively summarized and reported.
results95 articles met inclusion criteria and were finally included for the review. The included studies originated from 16 countries: the United States of America(n = 51), China (n = 6), Iran (n = 6), Japan(n = 5) and Turkey (n = 5) accounted for the majority of them. Research designs of included studies consisted of one cohort study, thirty randomized controlled trials, one cross-sectional study, six qualitative studies, fifty-four quasi-experimental studies and three mixed-method studies. Research objects of included studies consisted of 8 types, of which all disasters (n = 58), emerging infectious diseases (n = 13), mass casualty incidents (n = 10) and earthquake (n = 7) accounted for the majority. Together, these studies involved 31,981 participants including citizens, emergency health care providers, families of special health care needs, as well as students from different medical areas. Thematic analysis of the charted findings led to the identification of three stressed themes: (1) factors influencing the development of disaster preparedness education, (2) models and frameworks for disaster preparedness education and (3) innovative approaches in disaster preparedness education.
conclusionThis review demonstrates a variety of factors impacting the development and implementation of simulation to assess characteristics of disaster preparedness education. Adoption of models and frameworks such as behavior change theories, risk communication models and innovative approaches could improve the quality and consistency of the disaster preparedness education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.