Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39962436›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2025

Realizing the promise of machine learning in precision oncology: expert perspectives on opportunities and challenges.

Vasileios Nittas, Kelly E Ormond, Effy Vayena, Alessandro Blasimme

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vasileios NittasEpidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Hirschengraben 84, Zurich, 8001, Switzerland.
Kelly E OrmondHealth Ethics and Policy Lab, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH Zurich), Hottingerstrasse 10, Zurich, 8092, Switzerland.
Effy VayenaHealth Ethics and Policy Lab, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH Zurich), Hottingerstrasse 10, Zurich, 8092, Switzerland.
Alessandro BlasimmeHealth Ethics and Policy Lab, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH Zurich), Hottingerstrasse 10, Zurich, 8092, Switzerland. alessandro.blasimme@hest.ethz.ch.

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung NRP77 grant n. 407740_187356
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe ability of machine learning (ML) to process and learn from large quantities of heterogeneous patient data is gaining attention in the precision oncology community. Some remarkable developments have taken place in the domain of image classification tasks in areas such as digital pathology and diagnostic radiology. The application of ML approaches to the analysis of DNA data, including tumor-derived genomic profiles, microRNAs, and cancer epigenetic signatures, while relatively more recent, has demonstrated some utility in identifying driver variants and molecular signatures with possible prognostic and therapeutic applications.

methodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with academic and clinical experts to capture the status quo, challenges, opportunities, ethical implications, and future directions.

resultsOur participants agreed that machine learning in precision oncology is in infant stages, with clinical integration still rare. Overall, participants equated ongoing developments with better clinical workflows and improved treatment decisions for more cancer patients. They underscored the ability of machine learning to tackle the dynamic nature of cancer, break down the complexity of molecular data, and support decision-making. Our participants emphasized obstacles related to molecular data access, clinical utility, and guidelines. The availability of reliable and well-curated data to train and validate machine learning algorithms and integrate multiple data sources were described as constraints yet necessary for future clinical implementation. Frequently mentioned ethical challenges included privacy risks, equity, explainability, trust, and incidental findings, with privacy being the most polarizing. While participants recognized the issue of hype surrounding machine learning in precision oncology, they agreed that, in an assistive role, it represents the future of precision oncology.

conclusionsGiven the unique nature of medical AI, our findings highlight the field's potential and remaining challenges. ML will continue to advance cancer research and provide opportunities for patient-centric, personalized, and efficient precision oncology. Yet, the field must move beyond hype and toward concrete efforts to overcome key obstacles, such as ensuring access to molecular data, establishing clinical utility, developing guidelines and regulations, and meaningfully addressing ethical challenges.

Indexed as

Machine LearningMedical OncologyNeoplasmsPrecision MedicineHumansAlgorithmic biasArtificial intelligenceBiasBlack boxEthicsExplainabilityMachine learningOpacityPrecision oncologyPrivacy

Identifiers

PMID39962436
PMCPMC11834663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.