ArticleBMC geriatrics2025
The pictorial fit-frail scale: a novel tool for frailty assessment in critically ill older adults.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFrailty is a state of high vulnerability to adverse health outcomes. It is an important factor influencing the prognosis of older, critically ill patients. Several methods to assess frailty were evaluated in the critical care setting. The Pictorial Fit-Frail Scale (PFFS) is a validated quick and easy-to-use tool for frailty assessment. It takes < 5 min to fill by the patient or caregiver; it requires no clinical examination by medical staff. This study evaluated the use of the PFFS in an intensive care unit (ICU).
methodsA single-center retrospective study, performed in an 18-bed mixed medical-surgical ICU in a university-affiliated tertiary hospital. As of 1/9/2022, all older patients are routinely asked to fill out the PFFS. Patients were grouped based on their PFFS score. Baseline characteristics and admission outcomes were compared. Correlation between the PFFS and prognostic scores was examined. Mortality was analyzed using logistic and Cox regressions.
results168 patients were included. 56 (33.33%) patients were non-frail, 81 (48.21%) were mildly-moderately frail, and 31 (18.45%) were severely frail. There were no differences in baseline characteristics or prognostic scores between frailty groups. No correlation was found between PFFS, age, APACHE2, and SOFA24. Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated an association between frailty and 90d but not with ICU mortality. Cox regression demonstrated higher mortality in the mild-moderate frailty (HR 2.053, 95%CI 1.009, 4.179) and severe frailty (HR 4.353, (95% CI 1.934, 9.801)) groups compared to the non-frail group.
conclusionFrailty assessment by the PFFS in the ICU is feasible. Frailty is a distinct characteristic of older, critically ill patients and is independently associated with 90d mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.