Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39962403›Full record

ArticleBMC nephrology2025

Research on the development of an intelligent prediction model for blood pressure variability during hemodialysis.

Zhijian Ren, Minqiao Zhang, Pingping Wang, Kanan Chen, Jing Wang, Lingping Wu, Yue Hong, Yihui Qu, Qun Luo, Kedan Cai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Zhijian RenDepartment of Nephrology, Ningbo No.2 Hospital, Ningbo, PR China.
Minqiao ZhangDepartment of Nephrology, the First People's Hospital of Xiangshan, Ningbo, 315700, PR China.
Pingping WangDepartment of Rehabilitation, Ninghai First Hospital, Ningbo, PR China.
Kanan ChenDepartment of Nephrology, Ningbo No.2 Hospital, Ningbo, PR China.
Jing WangDepartment of Nephrology, Ningbo No.2 Hospital, Ningbo, PR China.
Lingping WuDepartment of Nephrology, Ningbo No.2 Hospital, Ningbo, PR China.
Yue HongDepartment of Nephrology, Ningbo No.2 Hospital, Ningbo, PR China.
Yihui QuDepartment of Nephrology, Ningbo No.2 Hospital, Ningbo, PR China.
Qun LuoDepartment of Nephrology, Ningbo No.2 Hospital, Ningbo, PR China.
Kedan CaiDepartment of Nephrology, Ningbo No.2 Hospital, Ningbo, PR China. caikedan@ucas.edu.cn.

Funding

the Ningbo City Public Welfare Research Program 2024S162the Ningbo Health Science and Technology Plan Project 2023Y89the Ningbo Major Research and Development Plan Project 2024Z213the Provincial and Municipal Joint Medical Key Discipline 2022-S03the Zhejiang Provincial Medical and Health Project 2024KY336
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveBlood pressure fluctuations during dialysis, including intradialytic hypotension (IDH) and intradialytic hypertension (IDHTN), are common complications among patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. Early prediction of IDH and IDHTN can help reduce the occurrence of these fluctuations. With the development of artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning models have become increasingly sophisticated in the field of hemodialysis. Utilizing machine learning to predict blood pressure fluctuations during dialysis has become a viable predictive method.

methodsOur study included data from 67,524 hemodialysis sessions conducted at Ningbo No.2 Hospital and Xiangshan First People's Hospital from August 1, 2019, to September 30, 2023. 47,053 sessions were used for model training and testing, while 20,471 sessions were used for external validation. We collected 45 features, including general information, vital signs, blood routine, blood biochemistry, and other relevant data. Data not meeting the inclusion criteria were excluded, and feature engineering was performed. The definitions of IDH and IDHTN were clarified, and 10 machine learning algorithms were used to build the models. For model development, the dialysis data were randomly split into a training set (80%) and a testing set (20%). To evaluate model performance, six metrics were used: accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, ROC-AUC, and PR-AUC. Shapley Additive Explanation (SHAP) method was employed to identify eight key features, which were used to develop a clinical application utilizing the Streamlit framework.

resultsStatistical analysis showed that IDH occurred in 56.63% of hemodialysis sessions, while the incidence of IDHTN was 23.53%. Multiple machine learning models (e.g., CatBoost, RF) were developed to predict IDH and IDHTN events. XGBoost performed the best, achieving ROC-AUC scores of 0.89 for both IDH and IDHTN in internal validation, with PR-AUC scores of 0.95 and 0.78, and high accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 scores. The SHAP method identified pre-dialysis systolic blood pressure, BMI, and pre-dialysis mean arterial pressure as the top three important features. It has been translated into a convenient application for use in clinical settings.

conclusionUsing machine learning models to predict IDH and IDHTN during hemodialysis is feasible and provides clinically reliable predictive performance. This can help timely implement interventions during hemodialysis to prevent problems, reduce blood pressure fluctuations during dialysis, and improve patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Blood PressureHypertensionHypotensionMachine LearningRenal DialysisAdultAgedDeep LearningFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID39962403
PMCPMC11834630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.