ArticleThe Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association2025
Evaluating implementation by rural clinics of evidence-based interventions to promote HPV vaccination.
Article in The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current practices, opportunities to improve, and behavioral targets related to HPV vaccination in community pharmacies: A qualitative study of pharmacy staff and parents.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Article
- Evaluating implementation by rural clinics of evidence-based interventions to promote HPV vaccination.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeDespite the well-established link between vaccination against human papillomavirus (HPV) and a decreased risk of cancer, HPV vaccine uptake in rural communities is low. Evidence-based interventions (EBIs) to promote HPV vaccination exist but are not universally implemented in rural settings due to various challenges. To understand the support needed by rural clinics in implementing EBIs, the University of Iowa partnered with the American Cancer Society (ACS) to evaluate an ACS HPV Vaccinating Adolescents against Cancers Quality Improvement Learning Collaborative that was delivered to six clinics in two rural health systems. The study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the learning collaborative approach for helping rural clinics implement EBIs aimed at increasing HPV vaccine uptake.
methodsSemistructured interviews were conducted with clinic staff at six time points throughout the 2-year intervention. Interviews were conducted over the phone and were recorded and transcribed. Members of the research team coded the interviews using codebooks informed by the interview guides. The analysis compared the health systems and identified the changes they made in response to assistance provided by the collaborative.
resultsClinic staff implemented the following EBIs: utilizing the immunization registry, strong provider recommendation, and provider education. Implementation of scheduling next dose fluctuated during the intervention. Differences were noted in the two health systems' implementation using electronic health records for patient and provider reminders.
conclusionSmall, rural clinics can implement effective EBIs, given proper support. This is important as such EBIs can increase HPV vaccination rates and help prevent HPV-associated cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.