ArticleThe Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association2025
Factors associated with multiple-death suicides among rural US decedents.
Article in The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- County-level vulnerability is associated with mental health and substance use treatment among rural suicide decedents: A national multi-year cross-sectional study.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2025Article
- Factors associated with multiple-death suicides among rural US decedents.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo identify contributing circumstances to multiple-death suicides in rural US counties from law enforcement and coroner/medical examiner narratives.
methodsWe identified multiple-death suicides as multiple suicides (i.e., two or more decedents) from the National Violent Death Reporting System (NVDRS) between 2013 and 2021. We identified rural decedents from their residence in NVDRS using federal information processing codes linked to Rural-Urban Continuum Codes. Quantitatively, we described demographic characteristics and circumstances leading to the suicide. From narrative law enforcement and coroner/medical examiner reports, we generated codes describing demographic and circumstance information using Dedoose software. We then used inductive content analysis to identify themes related to multiple-death suicides.
findingsAmong all multiple-death suicides (n = 50 multiple-death suicides, 99 suicide decedents), decedents were mostly non-Hispanic White (n = 90; 91%), were male (n = 54; 54%), and had a high school diploma or less (n = 51; 56%). We identified four themes: meticulous and considerate planning (e.g., with notes, reasons, and next steps), mutual dependency (e.g., decedents were in separable), unbearable health conditions (e.g., pain, poor quality of life from chronic illnesses), and social factors of despair (e.g., financial strain, legal problems, and interpersonal violence).
conclusionDeveloping strategies for discussing suicidal ideation and improving access to financial resources and health care may reduce multiple-death suicides in the rural United States, particularly among older adults with chronic health problems. Improving other public health initiatives such as interpersonal violence and chronic disease prevention and management may further prevent multiple-death suicides.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.