ArticleScientific reports2025
Deep convolutional neural network-based enhanced crowd density monitoring for intelligent urban planning on smart cities.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Secure Elliptic Galois Cryptography Framework for robust real-time vehicle image classification using convolutional sparse autoencoder in intelligent transportation systems.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Stampede detection and crowd analysis using CNN-LSTM and farneback optical flow.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A deep neural network-based green space design optimization framework for smart cities.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Robust crowd anomaly detection via hybrid ensemble learning for real-world surveillance.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The concept of a smart city has spread as a solution ensuring wider availability of data and services to citizens, apart from as a means to lower the environmental footprint of cities. Crowd density monitoring is a cutting-edge technology that enables smart cities to monitor and effectively manage crowd movements in real time. By utilizing advanced artificial intelligence and video analytics, valuable insights are accumulated from crowd behaviour, assisting cities in improving operational efficiency, improving public safety, and urban planning. This technology also significantly contributes to resource allocation and emergency response, contributing to smarter, safer urban environments. Crowd density classification in smart cities using deep learning (DL) employs cutting-edge NN models to interpret and analyze information from sensors such as IoT devices and CCTV cameras. This technique trains DL models on large datasets to accurately count people in a region, assisting traffic management, safety, and urban planning. By utilizing recurrent neural networks (RNNs) for time-series data and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for image processing, the model adapts to varying crowd scenarios, lighting, and angles. This manuscript presents a Deep Convolutional Neural Network-based Crowd Density Monitoring for Intelligent Urban Planning (DCNNCDM-IUP) technique on smart cities. The proposed DCNNCDM-IUP technique utilizes DL methods to detect crowd densities, which can significantly assist in urban planning for smart cities. Initially, the DCNNCDM-IUP technique performs image preprocessing using Gaussian filtering (GF). The DCNNCDM-IUP technique utilizes the SE-DenseNet approach, which effectually learns complex feature patterns for feature extraction. Moreover, the hyperparameter selection of the SE-DenseNet approach is accomplished by using the red fox optimization (RFO) methodology. Finally, the convolutional long short-term memory (ConvLSTM) methodology recognizes varied crowd densities. A comprehensive simulation analysis is conducted to demonstrate the improved performance of the DCNNCDM-IUP technique. The experimental validation of the DCNNCDM-IUP technique portrayed a superior accuracy value of 98.40% compared to existing DL models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.