Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39962305›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Optimizing blast design and bench geometry for stability and productivity in open pit limestone mines using experimental and numerical approaches.

Geleta Warkisa Deressa, Bhanwar Singh Choudhary, Nagessa Zerihun Jilo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Geleta Warkisa DeressaDepartment of Mining Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (Indian School of Mines), Dhanbad, Jharkhand, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-7792-3243
Bhanwar Singh ChoudharyDepartment of Mining Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (Indian School of Mines), Dhanbad, Jharkhand, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5729-1748
Nagessa Zerihun JiloDepartment of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Addis Ababa Science and Technology University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. nagessaz@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8981-3806

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optimizing blast design and bench geometry is crucial for enhancing the safety, efficiency, and sustainability of open-pit mining operations. This study examines the effects of blast design and bench geometry adjustments on bench slope stability through numerical modelling under static and dynamic loading conditions. Extensive data on rock mass, blast design parameters, and geomechanical properties were analyzed to assess these optimizations. Results indicate that reducing the bench height from 12 to 5 m improves the shear reduction factor (SRF) by 43.78%, while decreasing the bench face angle (BFA) from 90° to 60° enhances the SRF by 17.12%, demonstrating increased stability. Conversely, increasing the overall slope angle from 27.5° to 36.5° improves productivity by 57.14% but reduces the SRF by 17.12%, highlighting the trade-off between stability and extraction efficiency. Optimal conditions balancing stability and productivity were identified with a bench height of 7.5 m, a BFA of 75°, and a bench width of 14 m, yielding an SRF of 1.31 under static conditions and 1.16 under dynamic conditions. Simulations of blast dynamics revealed that the bench blast velocity decreased from 63.18 cm/s at a radial distance of 13 m to 23.99 cm/s at 18.5 m, indicating significant attenuation in particle motion over distance. Blast-induced ground vibrations (BIGV) were also evaluated, with notable peak particle acceleration near the blast zone. The study recommends a powder factor range of 0.31-0.51 kg/m

Indexed as

Bench geometryBlast designMine slope stabilityNumerical modellingOpen-pit mining

Identifiers

PMID39962305
PMCPMC11833129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.