ArticleScientific reports2025
A hybrid optimization-enhanced 1D-ResCNN framework for epileptic spike detection in scalp EEG signals.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early warning score and feasible complementary approach using artificial intelligence-based bio-signal monitoring system: a review.Biomedical engineering letters · 2025Review
- How Can Animal Models Advance Research into High Frequency Oscillations: Guidelines for Recording, Detection and Analysis.Epilepsy currentsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In order to detect epileptic spikes, this paper suggests a deep learning architecture that blends 1D residual convolutional neural networks (1D-ResCNN) with a hybrid optimization strategy. The Layer-wise Adaptive Moments (LAMB) and AdamW algorithms have been used in the model's optimization to improve efficiency and accelerate convergence while extracting features from time and frequency domain EEG data. The framework has been considered on two public epilepsy datasets CHB-MIT and Siena. In the CHB-MIT dataset, comprising 24-channel EEG recordings from 12 patients, the model achieved an accuracy of 99.71%, a sensitivity of 99.60%, and a specificity of 99.61% for detecting epileptic spikes. Similarly, in the Siena dataset, which includes EEG data from 14 adult patients, the model demonstrated an average accuracy of 99.75%. Sensitivity averaged 99.94%, while specificity averaged 99.95%. The false positive rate (FPR) remained low at 0.0011, and the model obtained an average F1-score of 99.74%. For real-time hardware validation, the 1D-ResCNN model was deployed within the Typhoon HIL simulator, utilizing embedded C2000 microcontrollers. This hardware configuration allowed for immediate spike detection with minimal latency, ensuring reliable performance in real-time clinical applications. The findings imply that the suggested approach provides suitable for identifying epileptic spikes in real time for medical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.