Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39962273›Full record

ArticleNature neuroscience2025

Brain pericytes and perivascular fibroblasts are stromal progenitors with dual functions in cerebrovascular regeneration after stroke.

Louis-Philippe Bernier, Jasmin K Hefendehl, R Wilder Scott, Lin Wei Tung, Coral-Ann Lewis, Hesham Soliman, Stefan Simm, Lasse Dissing-Olesen, Jan Hofmann, David Guo and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. In vivo programming of adult pericytes aids axon regeneration by providing cellular bridges for SCI repair.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Louis-Philippe Bernier *University of British Columbia, Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, Vancouver, British Colombia, Canada. lp.bernier@ubc.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5063-2338
Jasmin K Hefendehl *University of British Columbia, Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, Vancouver, British Colombia, Canada.
R Wilder ScottUniversity of British Columbia, Biomedical Research Centre, Vancouver, British Colombia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7608-7489
Lin Wei TungUniversity of British Columbia, Biomedical Research Centre, Vancouver, British Colombia, Canada.
Coral-Ann LewisUniversity of British Columbia, Biomedical Research Centre, Vancouver, British Colombia, Canada.
Hesham SolimanUniversity of British Columbia, Biomedical Research Centre, Vancouver, British Colombia, Canada.
Stefan SimmUniversity Medicine Greifswald, Institute for Bioinformatics, Greifswald, Germany.
Lasse Dissing-OlesenUniversity of British Columbia, Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, Vancouver, British Colombia, Canada.
Jan HofmannGoethe University Frankfurt, Institute for Cell biology and Neuroscience, Buchmann Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
David GuoUniversity of British Columbia, Biomedical Research Centre, Vancouver, British Colombia, Canada.
Murphy DeMeglioGoethe University Frankfurt, Institute for Cell biology and Neuroscience, Buchmann Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Fabio M RossiUniversity of British Columbia, Biomedical Research Centre, Vancouver, British Colombia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0368-2620
T Michael UnderhillUniversity of British Columbia, Biomedical Research Centre, Vancouver, British Colombia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3048-9102
Brian A MacVicarUniversity of British Columbia, Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, Vancouver, British Colombia, Canada. bmacvicar@brain.ubc.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4596-4623

Funding

Fondation Leducq 15CVD02Gouvernement du Canada | Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Instituts de Recherche en Santé du Canada) FDN-148397Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada (Heart and Stroke Foundation) G-23-0034151
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional revascularization is key to stroke recovery and requires remodeling and regeneration of blood vessels around which is located the brain's only stromal compartment. Stromal progenitor cells (SPCs) are critical for tissue regeneration following injury in many organs, yet their identity in the brain remains elusive. Here we show that the perivascular niche of brain SPCs includes pericytes, venular smooth muscle cells and perivascular fibroblasts that together help cerebral microvasculature regenerate following experimental stroke. Ischemic injury triggers amplification of pericytes and perivascular fibroblasts in the infarct region where they associate with endothelial cells inside a reactive astrocyte border. Fate-tracking of Hic1

Indexed as

BrainFibroblastsPericytesRegenerationStem CellsStrokeAnimalsMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLStromal Cells

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.