ArticleScientific reports2025
Oral colonization of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria in home health care participants and their association with oral and systemic status.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pathogenic bacterial profile and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in odontogenic facial cellulitis among Egyptian patients: A cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Gram-positive oral bacteria as reservoirs of transferable antimicrobial resistance genes in dentistry.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026Article
- Prevalence and Ecological Role of Streptococcus toyakuensis in Saliva of Healthy Young Individuals.International dental journal · 2026Article
- The oral cavity as a reservoir for resistance- and hypervirulence-associated genes ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- The Role of the Oral Microbiome and Dental Caries in Respiratory Health: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Antimicrobial Resistance in Oral Healthcare: A Growing Concern in Dentistry.Dentistry journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antimicrobial-resistant bacteria (ARBs) are serious global threat because they make it difficult to treat infections with antibiotics. Recently, it has been demonstrated that ARBs are isolated from the oral cavities of elderly individuals in long-term care facilities. Because oral ARBs can cause systemic diseases such as bacteraemia and aspiration pneumonia, more attention must be given to protect the overall health of elderly people. To understand the prevalence of oral ARBs, more studies are needed in addition to previous studies. In this study, we investigated oral ARBs in elderly people receiving home health care (HHC) who had different lifestyles as residents in long-term care facilities. Among 98 HHC participants, Staphylococcus aureus, including 8 methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains, was isolated from 31 participants (31.7%), and 3rd-generation cephalosporin-resistant gram-negative bacteria (GNARB) were isolated from 18 participants (17.8%). An analysis of the relationship between oral ARBs and clinical status revealed that S. aureus/MRSA isolation was correlated with denture condition, while GNARB isolation was correlated with tube feeding. This study is the first comprehensive analysis of ARB carriage in the oral cavities of elderly people in HHCs. These results demonstrate the potential risk of oral ARB carriage and the importance of infection control in HHCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.