Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39962260›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Stacked encoding and AutoML-based identification of lead-zinc small open pit active mines around Rampura Agucha in Rajasthan state, India.

Abhishek Kumar Ojha, Raja Biswas, Akhouri Pramod Krishna

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Abhishek Kumar OjhaDepartment of Remote Sensing, Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, Ranchi, India. phdrs10052.20@bitmesra.ac.in.
Raja BiswasDepartment of Remote Sensing, Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, Ranchi, India.
Akhouri Pramod KrishnaDepartment of Remote Sensing, Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, Ranchi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurately discerning lead-zinc open pit mining areas using traditional remote sensing methods is challenging due to spectral signature class mixing. However, machine learning (ML) algorithms have been implemented to classify satellite images, achieving better accuracy in discriminating complex landcover features. This study aims to characterise various ML models for detecting and classifying lead-zinc open pit mining areas amidst surrounding landcover features based on Sentinel 2 image analysis. Various associated band ratios and spectral indices were integrated with processed Sentinel 2 reflectance bands to enhance detection accuracy. Suitable bands highlighting lead and zinc mine areas were identified based on optimal index factor (OIF) analysis and various deep learning-based stacked encoders. Furthermore, 15 different ML classifiers were tested to identify optimised algorithms for accurately discriminating complex mining areas and associated landcover features. After detailed evaluation and comparison of their accuracies, the extra tree classifier (et) was the most effective, achieving an overall accuracy of 0.94 and a kappa coefficient of 0.93. The light gradient boosting machine classifier (lightgbm) and random forest classifier (rf) models also performed well, with overall accuracies of 0.937 and 0.936 and kappa coefficients of 0.925 and 0.925, respectively.

Indexed as

Automated machine learning (AutoML)Extra tree classifier (et)Light gradient boosting machine (lightgbm)Random forest classifier (rf)Stacked autoencoder (SAE)

Identifiers

PMID39962260
PMCPMC11832769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.