ArticleScientific reports2025
Temporal action localisation in video data containing rabbit behavioural patterns.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this paper we present the results of a research on artificial intelligence based approaches to temporal action localisation in video recordings of rabbit behavioural patterns. When using the artificial intelligence, special attention should be paid to quality and quantity of data collected for the research. Conducting the experiments in science may take long time and involve expensive preparatory work. Artificial intelligence based approaches can be applied to different kinds of actors in the video including animals, humans, intelligent agents, etc. The peculiarities of using these approaches in specific research conditions can be of particular importance for project cost reduction. In this paper we analyze the peculiarities of using the frame-by-frame classification based approach to temporal localisation of rabbit actions in video data and propose a metric for evaluating its consistency. The analysis of existing approaches described in the literature indicates that the aforementioned approach has high accuracy (up to 99%) and F1 score of temporal action localisation (up to 0.97) thus fulfilling conditions for substantial reduction or total exclusion of manual data labeling from the process of studying actor behaviour patterns in video data collected in experimental setting. We conducted further investigation in order to determine the optimal number of manually labeled frames required to achieve 99% accuracy of automatic labeling and studied the dependence of labeling accuracy on the number of actors presented in the training data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.