Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39962228›Full record

ArticleEMBO reports2025

Comparison of cable bacteria genera reveals details of their conduction machinery.

Leonid Digel, Mads L Justesen, Nikoline S Madsen, Nico Fransaert, Koen Wouters, Robin Bonné, Lea E Plum-Jensen, Ian P G Marshall, Pia B Jensen, Louison Nicolas-Asselineau and 8 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in EMBO reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. From single step hops to emergent biological phenomena.Journal of inorganic biochemistry · 2026
    Review
  8. 50 Years of Giese Reaction - a Personal View.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Leonid DigelCenter for Electromicrobiology, Aarhus University, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-2535-3497
Mads L Justesen *Center for Electromicrobiology, Aarhus University, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0009-0005-9884-4539
Nikoline S Madsen *Center for Electromicrobiology, Aarhus University, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0009-0001-1974-0397
Nico FransaertX-LAB, UHasselt, 3500, Hasselt, Belgium.
Koen WoutersCenter for Electromicrobiology, Aarhus University, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark.
Robin BonnéCenter for Electromicrobiology, Aarhus University, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark.
Lea E Plum-JensenCenter for Electromicrobiology, Aarhus University, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0009-0005-9433-1699
Ian P G MarshallCenter for Electromicrobiology, Aarhus University, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark.
Pia B JensenCenter for Electromicrobiology, Aarhus University, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0009-0007-8349-3910
Louison Nicolas-AsselineauCenter for Electromicrobiology, Aarhus University, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0009-0000-3818-4966
Taner DraceDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Aarhus University, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark.
Andreas BøggildInterdisciplinary Nanoscience Center (iNANO), Aarhus University, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark.
John L HansenInterdisciplinary Nanoscience Center (iNANO), Aarhus University, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark.
Andreas SchrammCenter for Electromicrobiology, Aarhus University, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7614-9616
Espen D BøjesenInterdisciplinary Nanoscience Center (iNANO), Aarhus University, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark.
Lars Peter NielsenCenter for Electromicrobiology, Aarhus University, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark.
Jean V MancaX-LAB, UHasselt, 3500, Hasselt, Belgium.
Thomas BoesenCenter for Electromicrobiology, Aarhus University, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark. thb@inano.au.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-5633-6844

Funding

Danish Ministry for Higher Education and Science 5072-00025BDanmarks Grundforskningsfond (DNRF) DNRF136Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (FWO) 11K4322NFonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (FWO) G013922NNovo Nordisk Foundation NNF20OC0060483
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cable bacteria are centimeter-long multicellular bacteria conducting electricity through periplasmic conductive fibers (PCFs). Using single-strain enrichments of the genera Electrothrix and Electronema we systematically investigate variations and similarities in morphology and electrical properties across both genera. Electrical conductivity of different PCFs spans three orders of magnitude warranting further investigations of the plasticity of their conduction machinery. Using electron microscopy and elemental analyses, we show that the two cable bacteria genera have similar cell envelopes and cell-cell junction ultrastructures. Iron, sulfur, and nickel signals are co-localized with the PCFs, indicating key functional roles of these elements. The PCFs are organized as stranded rope-like structures composed of multiple strands. Furthermore, we report lamellae-like structures formed at the cell-cell junctions with a core layer connecting to the PCFs, and intriguing vesicle-like inner membrane invaginations below the PCFs. Finally, using bioinformatic tools, we identify a cytochrome family with predicted structural homology to known multi-heme nanowire proteins from other electroactive microorganisms and suggest that these cytochromes can play a role in the extra- or intercellular electron conduction of cable bacteria.

Indexed as

BacteriaElectric ConductivityBacterial ProteinsCytochromesNickelPeriplasmBacterial ProteinsCytochromesNickelCable BacteriaCytochromeElectron ConductionElectron MicroscopyElectron Transfer

Identifiers

PMID39962228
PMCPMC11976967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.