Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39962210›Full record

ReviewNature food2025

Low-carbon ammonia production is essential for resilient and sustainable agriculture.

Stefano Mingolla, Lorenzo Rosa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature food, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Ammonia at the net-zero crossroads.Nature communications · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A global analysis of the rise, reign, and retreat of topics in research toward sustainable platform chemicals.Green chemistry : an international journal and green chemistry resource : GC · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Stefano MingollaBiosphere Sciences & Engineering, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9379-2980
Lorenzo RosaBiosphere Sciences & Engineering, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, CA, USA. lrosa@carnegiescience.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1280-9945

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ammonia-based synthetic nitrogen fertilizers (N fertilizers) are critical for global food security. However, their production, primarily dependent on fossil fuels, is energy- and carbon-intensive and vulnerable to supply chain disruptions, affecting 1.8 billion people reliant on either imported fertilizers or natural gas. Here we examine the global N-fertilizer supply chain and analyse context-specific trade-offs of low-carbon ammonia production pathways. Carbon capture and storage can reduce overall emissions by up to 70%, but still relies on natural gas. Electrolytic and biochemical processes minimize emissions but are 2-3 times more expensive and require 100-300 times more land and water than the business-as-usual production. Decentralized production has the potential to reduce transportation costs, emissions, reliance on imports and price volatility, increasing agricultural productivity in the global south, but requires policy support. Interdisciplinary approaches are essential to understand these trade-offs and find resilient ways to feed a growing population while minimizing climate impacts.

Indexed as

AgricultureAmmoniaCarbonFertilizersHumansNitrogenAmmoniaCarbonFertilizersNitrogen

Identifiers

PMID39962210
PMCPMC12185339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.