Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39962209›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Comparative analysis of the effects of Nano-SiO

Deyi Liu, Xutao Zhang, Xikuan Lyu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Deyi LiuSchool of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng, 252059, China.
Xutao ZhangSchool of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng, 252059, China. zhangxutao@lcu.edu.cn.
Xikuan LyuSchool of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng, 252059, China.

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, China ZR2022ME060
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To conduct a comparative analysis of the impacts of nanosilica (NS) and carbon nanotubes (CNTs) on the mechanical properties of polyethylene fiber-reinforced cementitious composites, seven groups of ECC specimens with different nanomaterial contents were prepared. The uniaxial compression and tensile tests were conducted, the mineral composition of the specimens was analyzed via X-ray diffraction, and the microstructure of the specimens was examined using a scanning electron microscope. The results show that both types of nanomaterials can effectively enhance the mechanical properties of ECC. Meanwhile, the mechanical characteristics of ECC exhibit a pattern of initial increase followed by a decrease as the nanomaterial content rises. NS exhibited superior performance in augmenting the compressive strength and early tensile crack strength of ECC; however, CNTs were more effective in enhancing the peak compressive strain and peak tensile strain of ECC. The difference between NS and CNTs in the enhancement of tensile strength was not significant. NS can consume more CH crystals to generate C-S-H gels to make the matrix material more dense, and can improve the properties of the transition zone at the fibre-gel interface to enhance the strength of ECC. While CNTs can bridge and inhibit crack extension on the micron scale, and can form a fibre mesh structure with PE fibres for more effective stress transfer, and can improve the deformation capacity of ECC on a macroscopic scale.

Indexed as

Carbon nanotubesEngineered cementitious composites (ECC)Mechanical propertiesMicrostructureNano-SiO2

Identifiers

PMID39962209
PMCPMC11833137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.