ReviewNature protocols2025
Sonication-assisted protein extraction improves proteomic detection of membrane-bound and DNA-binding proteins from tumor tissues.
Review in Nature protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-omic analyses of the same sample using metabolomics, lipidomics, proteomics, phosphoproteomics, and glycoproteomics.Chemical communications (Cambridge, England) · 2026Article
- Surface bioengineering of lanthanide nanoparticles for theranostic applications: From hydrophilic modification to multimodal imaging and therapy.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Proteomic Evidence Indicates Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction Enhances Recovery of Membrane-Associated Proteins inJournal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2026Article
- Delivery of TCM Monomers Using Blood Cell Membrane Coated Biomimetic Nanoparticles to Target CVD.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Extraction Techniques and Modification Methods for Regulating the Structural and Functional Properties of Oleosome-Associated Proteins: A Review.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Advancements in Sonication-Based Extraction Techniques for Ovarian Follicular Fluid Analysis: Implications for Infertility Diagnostics and Assisted Reproductive Technologies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep-scale, mass spectrometry-based proteomic studies by the Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium (CPTAC) program involves tissue lysis using urea buffer before data acquisition via mass spectrometry for quantitative global proteomic and phosphoproteomic analysis. This is described in a 2018 protocol
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.