ReviewNature chemistry2025
Progress and pitfalls in designing heterogeneous catalysts with molecular precision.
Review in Nature chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pseudotime uncovers restructuring dynamics and mitigators of metal catalyst deactivation.Science advances · 2026Article
- Atomically precise AuNature communications · 2026Article
- Quasi-In-Situ Analysis of Electrode Top Atomic Layers via High-Sensitivity Low-Energy Ion Scattering and Potential-Controlled Sample Transfer.Chemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society · 2026Article
- Bioinspired periodic mesoporous tin oxides enable steady nonequilibrium chemical sensing for enhanced gas discrimination.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Reversibly Redox-Active Iron Oxide Structures in FeNC Catalysts Identified by Microscopy and Spectroelectrochemical EPR and Mössbauer Methods.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026Article
- Biradical-mediated synergistic electrocatalysis using metal-free redox molecular catalysts.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atomically dispersed heterogeneous catalysts offer the opportunity to design active sites with molecular precision. A recent proliferation of synthetic strategies and advanced characterization tools has propelled broad interest in leveraging these catalysts in diverse areas of chemistry beyond thermal heterogeneous catalysis, including but not limited to organic synthesis, electrochemistry, photochemistry and environmental chemistry. This Perspective aims to arm researchers in this area with the methodological framework and fundamental principles to accurately assess the degree of uniformity of heterogeneous catalyst active sites, and to link the synthesis, structure and function of atomically dispersed catalysts to one another. A paedagogical discussion of catalyst structural dynamics and active-site-specific characterization is supplemented with recent case studies that illustrate these fundamentals. This analysis shows how progress can be guided by requiring that the characterization of active sites is connected to their kinetic behaviour in the form of turnover rates and by leveraging the thermokinetic factors that control active site structures and their dynamics.
Identifiers
39962193What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.