ArticleScientific reports2025
Prosopagnosia and the role of face-sensitive areas in race perception.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Frequency-tagged EEG reveals category-selective responses to face race.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2026Article
- A simple behavioral evaluation test of human face identity recognition with natural images validated with the case of prosopagnosia PS.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Race is rapidly and effortlessly extracted from faces. Previous fMRI studies have reported race-related modulations in the bilateral Fusiform Face Areas (FFAs) and Occipital Face Areas (OFAs) during the categorization of faces by race. However, our recent findings revealed a comparable Other-Race Categorization Advantage between a well-studied case of pure acquired prosopagnosia-patient PS-and healthy controls. Notably, PS demonstrated faster categorization by race of other-compared to same-race faces, similar to healthy participants, despite sustaining lesions in the right OFA (rOFA) and left FFA (lFFA). This observation suggests that race processing can occur effectively even with damage to core face-sensitive regions, challenging the functional significance of race-related activations in the rOFA and lFFA observed in healthy individuals with fMRI. To address this apparent contradiction, we tested PS and age-matched controls during the categorization by race of same- to other-race morphed faces. Our data showed that PS required more visual information to accurately categorize racially ambiguous faces, indicating that intact rOFA and/or lFFA are crucial for extracting fine-grained racial information. These results refine our understanding of the functional roles of these key cortical regions and offer novel insights into the neural mechanisms underlying the perception of face race and prosopagnosia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.