ArticleScientific reports2025
Surgical outcomes of unilateral medial rectus recession for partially accommodative esotropia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unilateral Medial Rectus Recession Can Produce Incomitance in Patients with Acute Acquired Comitant Esotropia: A Case Series.Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We investigated the long-term outcomes of unilateral medial rectus (UMR) recession surgery in partially accommodative esotropia (PAET). Children aged ≤ 10 years with PAET who had residual esotropia of ≤ 25 prism diopters (PD) after full hypermetropic correction and underwent UMR recession were included. Medical records of patients who were followed up for at least 1 year postoperatively were retrospectively reviewed. Successful outcome was defined as phoria of ≤ 5 PD. Total of 28 patients were included. The mean preoperative esodeviation at distance fixation was 15.5 ± 3.7 PD (range, 10-25 PD). The mean dose of UMR recession was 5.6 ± 0.7 mm (range, 4.0-7.0 mm). The average postoperative follow-up time was 4.4 ± 3.1 years. At the last examination, esodeviation significantly decreased to 6.2 ± 13.8 PD and the surgical success rate was 53.6%. In the success group, the age at surgery was older (P = 0.005), the duration of wearing prism glasses was longer (P = 0.030), and the amount of UMR recession was greater (P < 0.001) than in the failure group. Only half of the patients with small to moderate angle PAET achieved successful long-term outcomes through UMR recession. Having sufficient time to wear prism glasses before surgery to achieve good binocularity and receiving a sufficient amount of surgical correction may improve surgical success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.