ArticleScientific reports2025
Multicenter study on predicting postoperative upper limb muscle strength improvement in cervical spinal cord injury patients using radiomics and deep learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Machine Learning-Based Prognostic Models for Functional Outcomes in Spinal Cord Injury: Systematic Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Pooled it
- Current applications of radiomics in neurotrauma.Neurosurgical review · 2026Review
- Integration of MRI radiomics features and clinical data for predicting neurological recovery after thoracic spinal stenosis surgery: a machine learning model.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cervical spinal cord injury is often catastrophic, frequently leading to irreversible impairment. MRI has become the gold standard for evaluating spinal cord injuries (SCI). Our study aimed to assess the accuracy of a radiomics approach, based on machine learning and utilizing conventional MRI, in predicting the prognosis of patients with SCI. In a retrospective analysis of 82 SCI patients from three hospitals, we categorized them into good (n = 49) and poor (n = 33) prognosis groups. Preoperative T2-weighted MRI images were segmented using 3D-Region of Interest (ROI) techniques, and both radiomic and deep transfer learning features were extracted. These features were normalized using Z-score and harmonized via ComBat. Feature selection was performed using a greedy algorithm and Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), and others, followed by the calculation of radiomics scores through linear regression. Machine learning was then used to identify the most predictive radiomic features. Model performance was evaluated by analyzing the area under the curve (AUC) and other indicators.Univariate analysis indicated that the demographic characteristics of cervical spinal cord injury were not statistically significant. In the test dataset, the random forest (RF) combined with radiomics and ResNet34 demonstrated better performance, with an accuracy of 0.800 and an AUC of 0.893.Using MRI, deep learning-based radiomics signals show promise in evaluating and predicting the postoperative prognosis of these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.