ArticleScientific reports2025
Long-term efficacy of botulinum toxin for treatment of acquired non-accommodative comitant esotropia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparative efficacy of botulinum toxin and surgical treatment for acute acquired concomitant esotropia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Use of Botulinum Toxin for Esotropia Treatment in Government Hospitals of Bahrain: A Cross-Sectional Study.Cureus · 2026Article
- Botulinum toxin type A injection in treatment of pediatric cyclic esotropia.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Surgical outcomes of bilateral medial rectus recession in cases of acute acquired comitant esotropia.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Botulinum toxin for acute acquired comitant esotropia: clinical outcomes and predictors.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acquired non-accommodative comitant esotropia (ANAET) represents a distinct subclass of esotropia that predominantly manifests in older children and adults. Injection of Botulinum Toxin A (BTX) to the extraocular muscle has been used to treat strabismus and a variety of other ocular conditions. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the long-term effectiveness of BTX injections for treating ANAET. In the Department of Ophthalmology at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital between the years 2010 to 2022, a total of 42 patients diagnosed as ANAET with a distant angle of esodeviation ≤ 25 PD and treated with BTX injection were retrospectively reviewed. Data collected from the patients' records included the angle of distant and near esodeviation before injection, post-treatment ocular alignment at distance and near at 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and the last follow-up examination, the number of injections and dosage of BTX, and complications after treatment. Treatment was considered successful if the final ocular alignment showed esophoria of 6 PD or less during distant fixation. The baseline esodeviation, determined by the maximum angle of esodeviation at distance before the first BTX injection, was 14.5 ± 5.6 PD. The mean duration from the last BTX injection to the final outpatient visit was 23.7 ± 16.1 months. The treatment success rates for all patients were 90.5% (38/42) at 6 months, 76.2% (32/42) at 1 year, and 73.8% (31/42) at the final examination. By multivariate analysis, the baseline angle of esodeviation (p = 0.008) was the only significant factor related to final success. BTX injection can be a highly favorable therapeutic option for ANAET patients. Specifically, if the maximum angle of deviation in ANAET patients is 15PD or less before treatment, it is advisable to attempt BTX therapy as a first-line treatment option for long-term success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.