ArticleCommunications medicine2025
Early cardio-oncology intervention in thoracic radiotherapy: prospective single-arm pilot study.
Article in Communications medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Associations between reported atrial fibrillation burden and cardiac substructure dosimetric variables in patients receiving thoracic radiotherapy for malignancies involving the thorax: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Cardioprotective medications and the incidence of cardiovascular events in patients treated with radiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhile there is increasing recognition of the morbidity of cardiovascular disease in cancer survivors, including accelerated atherosclerosis following thoracic radiotherapy, patients are frequently under-optimized for cardiovascular risk.
methodsIn this prospective single-arm cohort pilot study, patients were treated with high-dose thoracic radiotherapy and had early consultation with cardio-oncology. Twenty patients were enrolled. The primary endpoint was adherence to cardio-oncology consultation. Secondary endpoints were cardiovascular medication intervention rate and patient-reported intervention perspectives. Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential, a major cardiovascular risk marker enriched in patients with cancer and induced by radiation exposure, was measured as an exploratory endpoint.
resultsThe cohort median age is 71 years. Most patients are female (13/20), have primary lung or esophageal carcinoma (16/20), and 7/20 have pre-existing cardiovascular disease. We show that cardio-oncology consultation adherence is high (19/20) and results in cardiovascular medication optimization changes in most patients (12/19), most commonly to initiate or intensify statin therapy (8/12). 8/12 patients with a primary cardiologist prior to enrollment have medication changes recommended. Most (12/17) participants are glad to learn about their heart health during cancer treatment. Clonal hematopoiesis is detectable prior to treatment in 8/20 patients and three develop new variants after treatment (1/3 de novo).
conclusionsWe observe that early cardio-oncology consultation is feasible, leads to cardiovascular medication optimization in the majority (>60%) of participants, most commonly to initiate or intensify statin therapy. New clonal hematopoiesis variants are detectable early after radiotherapy and the impact on post-treatment cardiovascular risk is worthy of further study.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.