ArticleScientific reports2025
Carotid revascularization improves cognition in patients with carotid stenosis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with atherosclerosis in the carotid arteries are at risk of ischemic stroke and cognitive decline due to emboli and chronic hypoperfusion of brain tissue. Revascularization procedures improve cerebral hemodynamics, which has some effect on cognitive function. Some authors suggest that the presence of stenosis in the carotid arteries is an independent factor influencing cognitive decline. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the degree of stenosis of a stented carotid artery and attentional performance in individuals with carotid atherosclerosis. A prospective longitudinal study was conducted at a single center involving patients during cardiology hospitalization (T-1) and 1 year after hospital admission (T-2) for invasive treatment of carotid stenosis. The attention D2 test by R. Brickenkamp was used. The study showed that a critical degree of internal carotid artery stenosis is associated with poorer attentional performance in individuals undergoing carotid artery stenting. However, the ability to concentrate improved one year after the procedure in all groups of patients who underwent carotid artery stenting, regardless of the degree of internal carotid artery stenosis. It was also found that the side of the vasoconstriction (right/left) in patients with atherosclerosis in the carotid arteries has no influence on cognitive functions in relation to attention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.