ArticleScientific reports2025
A novel UPLC-based method to identify elephant and mammoth ivory.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The illegal ivory trade has led to a sharp decline in wild elephant populations in recent decades, while mammoth (Mammuthus primigenius) ivory products have increasingly flooded the marketplace, complicating identification efforts by frontline law enforcement. Existing ivory identification methods face several challenges, including inconsistent accuracy due to sample quality, high costs, slow turnaround times, and destructive sample requirements. Currently, there is a lack of a fast, convenient, and highly effective solution to address these issues. To tackle these challenges, this study developed a novel, efficient, and accurate method for identifying and characterizing ivory products using ultra-performance liquid chromatography with a fluorescence detector (UPLC-FLR). The technique focuses on various organic small-molecule compounds in ivory that have been largely overlooked. A chemical fingerprint library was created using 72 African elephant and 69 mammoth ivory samples. Comprehensive comparative analyses, including principal component analysis, compound distribution analysis, proportion analysis, chord diagrams, and statistical significance tests, revealed significant differences between the organic compounds in the two sample groups, confirming the method's reliability. Six widely used machine learning classification models were then applied to construct a discriminant model based on 11 key feature compounds among the 85 identified, with each model achieving 100% classification accuracy. Compared to the conventional 'gold standard' molecular biology method, this UPLC-based approach shortened detection time from 24 h to just 1 h, reduced the sample requirement by 50%, and cut costs by 90%, making it a more efficient, user-friendly solution for frontline law enforcement. Widespread adoption of this method in law enforcement could become a powerful tool in the fight against the illegal ivory trade.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.