ArticleScientific reports2025
Nonlinear mixed-effects models to analyze actin dynamics in dendritic spines.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) allows to study actin-turnover in dendritic spines by providing recovery trajectories over time within a nested data structure (i.e. spine/neuron/culture). Statistical approaches to FRAP usually consider one-phase association models to estimate recovery-curve-specific parameters and test statistical hypotheses on curve parameters either at the spine or neuron level, ignoring the nested data structure. However, this approach leads to pseudoreplication concerns. We propose a nonlinear mixed-effects model to integrate the one-phase association model estimate with the nested data structure of FRAP experiments; this also allows us to model heteroscedasticity and time dependence in the data. We used this approach to evaluate the effect of the downregulation of the actin-binding protein CAP2 on actin dynamics. Our model allows the additional modelling of the variance function across experimental conditions, which may represent a novel parameter of interest in FRAP experiments. Indeed, the detected differential effect of the experimental condition on the variance component captures the increased instability of time-specific observations around the spine-specific trajectory for the CAP2-downregulated spines compared to the control spines. We hypothesise that this parameter reflects the increased instability of the actin cytoskeleton in dendritic spines upon CAP2 downregulation. We developed an R-based Shiny application, termed FRApp, to fit the statistical models introduced without requiring programming expertise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.